Wednesday, November 5, 2025
Trusted News Since 2020
American News Network
Truth. Integrity. Journalism.
US Politics

Major phone carriers reveal Jack Smith’s subpoenas for Republican senators’ records

By Eric October 31, 2025

In a significant development emerging from the ongoing investigation led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, two major phone carriers, Verizon and AT&T, have taken contrasting stances regarding subpoenas for phone records linked to Republican lawmakers. According to redacted subpoenas and letters shared with Fox News Digital, Verizon complied with Smith’s request, while AT&T chose to resist. The subpoenas are part of the Arctic Frost investigation, which has culminated in election-related charges against former President Donald Trump. The documents revealed that Verizon’s compliance included records associated with several prominent Republican senators, including Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, while AT&T only acknowledged a request for records related to Cruz and another unnamed lawmaker.

The subpoenas were accompanied by gag orders from U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, which prohibited the phone companies from disclosing the requests to the lawmakers for a period of one year. Verizon justified its compliance by stating that the subpoenas were “facially valid” and only requested phone numbers without names. However, the company indicated that it has since revised its policies to challenge such requests more vigorously in the future. In contrast, AT&T expressed concerns regarding the legal basis for the subpoenas and did not produce any records after raising questions with Smith’s office, leading to a cessation of the inquiry. The subpoenas specifically sought call detail records for a four-day period surrounding the January 6 Capitol riot, without requesting the contents of calls or messages.

The revelation of these subpoenas has ignited a firestorm among the implicated lawmakers, who argue that the actions taken by Smith’s team represent an overreach akin to a “political enemies list.” They have raised constitutional concerns, particularly regarding the speech and debate clause, which provides lawmakers with immunity from certain investigations. Smith, however, has defended the subpoenas, asserting that they were narrowly tailored and appropriate given the context of the investigation. This situation has drawn parallels to past controversies surrounding congressional subpoenas, emphasizing the delicate balance between law enforcement and legislative oversight. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the implications of these actions on congressional immunity and oversight remain a focal point of debate among lawmakers and legal experts alike.

Related articles:
– Link 1
– Link 2

FIRST ON FOX:
Two major phone carriers took sharply different paths when former special counsel Jack Smith’s team subpoenaed phone records tied to Republican lawmakers in 2023, according to the redacted subpoenas and letters first shared with Fox News Digital.
The documents, provided by the office of Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, reveal Verizon’s compliance and AT&T’s resistance when faced with Smith’s requests, which were part of Arctic Frost, the FBI probe that led to Smith bringing election charges against President
Donald Trump
.
The 12 phone numbers on the subpoena to Verizon are redacted and replaced by Grassley’s office with the names of the lawmakers associated with them. They include one House member and 10 senators, including Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fl., whose name was not previously reported.
AT&T received a similar request, according to a second subpoena. The company told Grassley the subpoenaed phone records were associated with two lawmakers, including Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, according to a source directly familiar with the matter. The source said AT&T declined to disclose the second person.
REPUBLICANS CLAIM BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ‘ENEMIES LIST’ UNEARTHED FROM ARCTIC FROST INVESTIGATION
Accompanying the two subpoenas were gag orders, signed by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of Washington, D.C., that directed the two phone companies not to disclose the subpoenas to the lawmakers for one year. Prosecutors can seek such gag orders to temporarily keep investigative matters confidential.
The phone companies also wrote letters to Grassley, first shared with Fox News Digital, explaining how they handled the subpoenas they received, revealing two different approaches.
Verizon justified complying with the subpoenas, saying they were “facially valid” and contained only phone numbers, not names. Verizon said that with the “benefit of hindsight” and recent discussions with the Senate Sergeant at Arms, which handles congressional phone services, it has modified its policies so that it puts up more of a challenge to law enforcement requests pertaining to Congress members.
AT&T, meanwhile, did not comply with the subpoenas.
“When AT&T raised questions with Special Counsel Smith’s office concerning the legal basis for seeking records of members of Congress, the Special Counsel did not pursue the subpoena further, and no records were produced,” David Chorzempa, general counsel for AT&T, wrote.
The release of copies of the subpoenas and new details from phone companies comes after
Grassley
published earlier this month a one-page FBI document indicating the existence of the subpoenas and naming most of the senators. They included Republican Sens. Marsha Blackburn, Josh Hawley, Lindsey Graham, Bill Hagerty, Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, Ron Johnson and Cynthia Lummis.
Cruz later revealed that he was in the mix, and Scott announced on Thursday that he too was a target.
Grassley said Wednesday that Smith’s subpoena to Verizon included Cruz’s office’s landline. In Verizon’s letter to Grassley, it noted that there were no records to give Smith pertaining to the landline request.
The two subpoenas to Verizon and AT&T sought toll records for a four-day period surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. They did not include the contents of phone calls or messages, which would require a warrant, but they did include “[call] detail records for inbound and outbound calls, text messages, direct connect, and voicemail messages” and phone number subscriber and payment information.
News of the subpoenas sparked an outcry from the senators, who claimed Smith improperly spied on them and that Arctic Frost was “worse” than the Watergate scandal. The lawmakers have raised numerous constitutional concerns, including claims that the subpoenas violated the speech and debate clause, which gives lawmakers an added layer of immunity from investigations.
JACK SMITH DEFENDS SUBPOENAING REPUBLICAN SENATORS’ PHONE RECORDS: ‘ENTIRELY PROPER’
Smith, in response, said in a
letter
through his lawyers that he mentioned subpoenaing senators’ phone records in his public, final special counsel report and that the subpoenas were narrowly tailored to the four-day period and “entirely proper.”
Smith has asked House and Senate lawmakers to allow him to testify before them in a public hearing to speak about his special counsel work. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, however, wants to question Smith behind closed doors and Grassley has said he needs more information before he hosts Smith in a public setting.
The DOJ has issued subpoenas for lawmakers’ information in the past, but former inspector general
Michael Horowitz
cautioned against it except in limited circumstances in a report published last year, saying that doing so “risks chilling Congress’s ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch.”
Horowitz’s warning came in response to the first Trump administration subpoenaing phone records of Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and then-Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and dozens of congressional staffers from both parties as part of an investigation into classified information being leaked to the media.
Despite enjoying additional constitutional protections, members of
Congress
can still be investigated and prosecuted. Former Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez’s phone records were seized while he was serving in office. Menendez is now serving in prison after being found guilty by a jury last year of corruption charges.

E

Eric

Eric is a seasoned journalist covering US Politics news.

Related Articles

Here are the races to watch this Election Day
US Politics

Here are the races to watch this Election Day

Read More →
How one tech startup is giving cash to SNAP recipients
US Politics

How one tech startup is giving cash to SNAP recipients

Read More →
Here are the races to watch this Election Day
US Politics

Here are the races to watch this Election Day

Read More →

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *