General

Kristi Noem claims suspect in national guard shooting was ‘radicalized’ in US

In a recent statement, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem addressed the troubling incident of a National Guard shooting in Washington, D.C., attributing the alleged radicalization of the suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, to influences within the United States. Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan national, had his asylum request approved in April 2025 during the Trump administration, following his service with CIA-backed units in Afghanistan. He arrived in the U.S. in September 2021 as part of the Operation Allies Welcome program, designed to support Afghan allies after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. Noem’s comments have sparked controversy, particularly as they seem to shift focus away from the previous administration’s role in granting Lakanwal asylum, raising questions about the politicization of national security issues.

Noem’s remarks also included a pointed critique of the Biden administration’s handling of immigration and border security. In her view, the current administration has created an environment conducive to radicalization, a claim that many critics argue oversimplifies complex issues surrounding immigration and national security. Additionally, she criticized “activist” judges for allegedly defying court orders aimed at halting deportation flights, suggesting that judicial decisions are undermining the government’s ability to manage immigration effectively. This rhetoric aligns with a broader narrative among some Republican leaders who seek to frame immigration policy as a key issue for the upcoming elections, emphasizing a need for stricter measures and accountability in the asylum process.

As the debate over immigration and national security continues, Lakanwal’s case serves as a focal point for discussions about the effectiveness of current policies and the implications of past decisions. The tension between judicial authority and executive power, especially in the context of immigration enforcement, remains a contentious issue in American politics. Critics of Noem’s stance argue that her comments may distract from the real challenges facing the nation’s security apparatus, while supporters contend that highlighting potential failures in the asylum system is crucial for preventing future incidents. As the situation develops, it will be essential to monitor how these discussions shape public opinion and policy in the lead-up to the next election cycle.