Jonah Goldberg: Presidents can no longer be trusted with pardons
In a compelling examination of the U.S. presidential pardon power, Jonah Goldberg argues for a constitutional amendment to eliminate this authority, citing recent abuses by Presidents Trump and Biden. The foundational principle of America’s government is a system of checks and balances, where the powers of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches are designed to limit any one branch from becoming too powerful. While this system has historically provided a framework for governance, Goldberg contends that the unchecked nature of the presidential pardon power has led to significant abuses that undermine the integrity of the justice system.
Goldberg highlights specific instances of these abuses, pointing to Trump’s controversial pardons of political allies and individuals connected to criminal activities, including those involved in the January 6 Capitol riots. Similarly, Biden’s pardons, which many view as politically motivated, further illustrate the potential for misuse. For example, Biden’s pardons for family members and associates have raised eyebrows, especially given the questionable nature of some of their business dealings. The author argues that these actions not only erode public trust in the presidency but also highlight a broader failure of Congress to hold presidents accountable through impeachment—a power that has become increasingly ineffective in today’s hyper-partisan climate.
The historical context provided by Goldberg underscores the original intent of the Founding Fathers, particularly James Madison, who believed that any misuse of the pardon power could be rectified through impeachment. However, as partisan divides deepen, the likelihood of Congress effectively checking presidential power diminishes, leading to a call for reform. Goldberg proposes that while the notion of pardons and clemency remains important, it should not rest solely with the president. By amending the Constitution to address these concerns, the integrity of the justice system could be preserved, ensuring that the power to grant pardons does not become a tool for political favor or personal gain. In an era where the rule of law is increasingly questioned, Goldberg’s argument presents a timely and necessary discussion on the need for accountability within the highest office in the land.
Ours is a system of “checks and balances.”
The president can do this or that, but the courts and Congress can put a stop to it (depending on the circumstances and relevant rules). When the courts rule that the executive branch can’t do something, Congress can write a new law saying the president can do it. When Congress passes a law the president doesn’t like, the president can veto it. Congress, if it has enough votes, can override the veto. And so on. The whole idea is to deny any one branch or person too much concentrated power.
I’m sorry if I sound a bit condescending given that everyone is supposed to have learned this stuff in grade school. But it seems a lot of people have forgotten how our system is supposed to work, so I thought a quick recap might be helpful.
Anyway, even under our system, each branch has powers that really can’t be checked. Congress, for instance, has sole authority to levy taxes and spend taxpayer money, declare war, etc. Once a court acquits a defendant, the defendant can’t be prosecuted for that crime again.
The president has some unique powers too. Including the sole, final authority to grant pardons, which cannot be reviewed or repealed by Congress or the courts.
It’s time we changed that — and the only way to do so is by amending the Constitution.
There are two reasons for getting rid of the president’s power to pardon. The first is the grotesque abuses of that power by Presidents Trump and Biden. In his first term, Trump issued a series of
egregious pardons
for, among others,
lackeys
,
war
criminals
and
political
allies
.
Biden then issued blanket and preemptive
pardons
for
his
family
and various political allies. Partisan defenders like to say this was necessary to protect the Bidens from persecution by the incoming Trump administration. These defenses tend to overlook the
Biden
family’s
exceedingly
shady business
dealings
. They also ignore a raft of other pardons and commutations Biden allegedly just outsourced to ideologues on his staff.
Back in office in 2025, Trump has outdone Biden (and himself). He launched his second term by granting mass pardons to the goons who beat police with flagpoles and stormed the Capitol on his behalf on Jan. 6, 2021. Since then, he’s pardoned a rogues’ gallery of donors, partisan allies and people with business ties to him or his family, including crypto billionaire Changpeng Zhao, the chief executive of Binance, a trading platform that
allowed
terrorists and criminal organizations to finance their operations under the radar.
Zhao pleaded guilty to money laundering, but he also worked
assiduously
to boost the Trump family’s crypto business. It certainly
appears
that he got a pardon in exchange for services rendered.
The second reason for getting rid of the president’s pardon power involves that earlier stuff about checks and balances. The Founding Fathers believed the only remedy for the corrupt abuse or misuse of pardons was impeachment. James Madison, the principal author of the Constitution, was explicit on this point.
At the Virginia ratifying convention, George Mason objected that the pardon power was too great, and that presidents could use pardons to suborn criminal activity on their behalf. Madison
responded
that, “If the president be connected in any suspicious manner with any (such) persons, and there be grounds to believe he will shelter himself, the house of representatives can impeach him.”
The problem: Congress’ impeachment power has proven to be a dead letter in the modern era of hyper-partisanship. Just as presidents cannot be trusted to use the pardon power responsibly, Congress cannot be trusted with the responsibility to hold presidents accountable. Without checks, there is no balance.
There still should be room for pardons and clemency in our system. But leaving it solely in the power of presidents has led to evermore abuse. Indeed, I think it’s almost a certainty that Trump will use the Biden precedent to preemptively pardon much of his administration, his sons and himself before he leaves office. Given the ongoing weaponization of the justice system — and his abuse of it — he’d almost be a fool not to.
The Constitution was written with men like George Washington in mind. When Washington opted to step down after two terms, it established a two-term tradition that endured until Franklin Roosevelt violated it. Afterward, we amended the Constitution to codify what had been a tradition.
For most of our history, presidents took the solemnity of pardons — and the threat of impeachments — seriously. They no longer do. It’s time to change the Constitution accordingly.
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is
@JonahDispatch
.
