Cal Thomas: We lose, they win
In a striking contrast to the resolute stance of President Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, current dynamics surrounding the U.S. response to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine have taken a worrying turn. President Trump’s proposed peace plan for Ukraine, which he has put forth to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy with a deadline of Thanksgiving Day, appears to mirror the demands of Russian President Vladimir Putin rather than embodying a fair resolution. Reports indicate that the plan may have originated from Russian sources, raising concerns about its legitimacy and intent. This proposal, described as a “leaked wish list” by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, would require Ukraine to concede significant territories, including Crimea and parts of the Eastern Donbas region, and abandon its aspirations for NATO membership, effectively capitulating to many of Putin’s longstanding demands.
The implications of this proposal are profound and troubling. The draft suggests that Ukraine would have to accept a military cap while Russia faces no similar restrictions, and it outlines a vague “security” arrangement that does little to deter further aggression from Moscow. Critics argue that this plan not only undermines Ukraine’s sovereignty but also emboldens Putin’s ambitions to reclaim former Soviet territories, setting a dangerous precedent for international relations. As the situation unfolds, the potential for Russia to violate any agreement is high, with historical precedents indicating that Putin is unlikely to adhere to any terms that do not serve his expansionist goals. The U.S. and Ukraine’s reported agreement to revise the peace plan raises further questions about the effectiveness of any deal that does not fundamentally challenge Russia’s aggressive posture.
Ultimately, this situation reflects a broader dilemma in U.S. foreign policy, where the pursuit of peace risks being conflated with appeasement. As the world watches, the outcome of these negotiations could either pave the way for a fragile resolution or embolden authoritarian regimes to pursue their ambitions unchecked. The stakes are high, and the need for a robust and principled response to Russian aggression has never been more critical.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cp-AK8ETdg
In 1988, when President Ronald Reagan was asked by a reporter during the summit in Moscow what his goal was in the Cold War, he
said
: “we win, they lose.”
When it comes to today’s Russia and its unprovoked war with Ukraine, President Trump’s goal at least in practice and outcome appears to be “we lose, they win.”
The president has given Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy until Thanksgiving Day to
accept
his “peace proposal” which reads as if it could have been written by Vladimir Putin. In fact, according to news reports, it may have been. According to the
NY Post
, “Secretary of State Marco Rubio told US senators Saturday that the sweeping peace plan to end the nearly four-year war between Russia and Ukraine was not America’s — but merely a ‘leaked’ Russian ‘wish list.”
Maybe so, but it seems to align with the one-sided pressure Trump has put on Zelenskyy to settle the war since he took office. Trump said Saturday the proposal is not his “
final offer.
”
If the document is from the administration, it is capitulation to most of Putin’s demands and is an invitation for the dictator to continue pursuing his stated goal of re-taking all of the former Soviet satellite countries, which have been free and independent since the end of the Cold War.
According to a draft of the proposal shared publicly by a member of the Ukraine opposition party, the 28-point document would require Ukraine to surrender its Eastern Donbas region, as well as Crimea, the latter of which no previous administration has demanded since Putin invaded Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula. It also would require Ukraine to forgo NATO membership, though it does loosely promise a “security” force, presumably to prevent Putin from gobbling up more territory. If Zelinskyy bows to U.S. pressure and accepts a deal forced upon him, we might as well get the U.S.S. Missouri out of mothballs and replicate the signing of surrender documents by the Japanese, ending World War II.
In a statement to CBS News, White House press secretary
Karoline Leavitt
said: “This plan was crafted to reflect the realities of the situation, after five years of a devastating war, to find the best win-win scenario, where both parties gain more than they must give.” That sounds like an admission the document came from us.
Among the
provisions
in the proposed deal is that Russia would be allowed to keep much of the territory it now occupies and even take over land Ukraine currently holds, along with regions of Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. These would be recognized by the U.S. as de facto Russia territory. Any bets on how long it would take Putin to swallow whole these regions into greater Russia?
The plan creates a neutral “buffer zone” with no Russian forces allowed. Again, place your bets on how long that will last?
Zelenskyy will be required to cap the size of his military (there is no similar requirement for Russia) and promise not to become a NATO member, but it can join the European Union. Does anyone expect the EU to mount a significant resistance should Putin choose to violate the agreement and especially if he invades other countries as he has promised to do to restore the old Soviet satellite countries? It may be the only promise he has ever kept.
There is so much potential for Russia to violate the proposed agreement and so little effective response outlined if it does. These include more sanctions which so far have not worked.
Putin has always had a goal in the war he started, but the U.S. and Europe have vacillated about ours. This proposed peace deal will only encourage vile dictators like Putin. President Trump likes to say he wants to end wars. This agreement will only encourage Putin’s voracious appetite to start new ones as well as eventually finish the one against Ukraine.
Late Sunday, the U.S. and Ukraine
reportedly
agreed to change the draft of the peace plan, but the key is whether Putin will agree to anything that won’t give him everything he wants.
Readers may email Cal Thomas at
tcaeditors@tribpub.com
. Look for Cal Thomas’ latest book “A Watchman in the Night: What I’ve Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America” (HumanixBooks).
