Jonah Goldberg: Presidents can no longer be trusted with pardons
In a thought-provoking article, Jonah Goldberg addresses the critical issue of presidential pardon power within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, arguing for its reevaluation and potential amendment. He begins by reminding readers of the fundamental principle of checks and balances that underpins the American political system, where each branch of government holds certain powers that can limit the others. However, Goldberg highlights a significant concern: the presidential power to grant pardons remains unchecked and has been increasingly abused by recent administrations. He cites examples from both Presidents Trump and Biden, noting that Trump’s pardons included controversial figures and alleged criminals, while Biden’s actions raised eyebrows regarding his family and political allies.
Goldberg argues that the original intent of the Founding Fathers was to ensure that the pardon power could be checked through impeachment. Yet, he points out that modern political polarization has rendered this mechanism ineffective, leading to a situation where neither the presidency nor Congress can be trusted to exercise their powers responsibly. He emphasizes the need for a constitutional amendment to limit or redefine the presidential pardon power, suggesting that while clemency is essential, it should not be concentrated in the hands of a single individual. The article serves as a call to action for reform, advocating for a system that upholds accountability and integrity in governance, reflecting a need for adaptation to contemporary political realities.
Overall, Goldberg’s piece is a compelling examination of an often-overlooked aspect of executive power, urging a reconsideration of how the presidency should operate in relation to the justice system. By invoking historical context and the intentions of the Founding Fathers, he makes a strong case for why it is time to reassess the pardon power and implement necessary changes to ensure that it serves the public good rather than personal interests.
Ours is a system of “checks and balances.”
The president can do this or that, but the courts and Congress can put a stop to it (depending on the circumstances and relevant rules). When the courts rule that the executive branch can’t do something, Congress can write a new law saying the president can do it. When Congress passes a law the president doesn’t like, the president can veto it. Congress, if it has enough votes, can override the veto. And so on. The whole idea is to deny any one branch or person too much concentrated power.
I’m sorry if I sound a bit condescending given that everyone is supposed to have learned this stuff in grade school. But it seems a lot of people have forgotten how our system is supposed to work, so I thought a quick recap might be helpful.
Anyway, even under our system, each branch has powers that really can’t be checked. Congress, for instance, has sole authority to levy taxes and spend taxpayer money, declare war, etc. Once a court acquits a defendant, the defendant can’t be prosecuted for that crime again.
The president has some unique powers too. Including the sole, final authority to grant pardons, which cannot be reviewed or repealed by Congress or the courts.
It’s time we changed that — and the only way to do so is by amending the Constitution.
There are two reasons for getting rid of the president’s power to pardon. The first is the grotesque abuses of that power by Presidents Trump and Biden. In his first term, Trump issued a series ofÂ
egregious pardons
for, among others,
lackeys
,Â
war
Â
criminals
 andÂ
political
Â
allies
.
Biden then issued blanket and preemptiveÂ
pardons
 forÂ
his
Â
family
 and various political allies. Partisan defenders like to say this was necessary to protect the Bidens from persecution by the incoming Trump administration. These defenses tend to overlook theÂ
Biden
Â
family’s
Â
exceedingly
Â
shady business
Â
dealings
. They also ignore a raft of other pardons and commutations Biden allegedly just outsourced to ideologues on his staff.
Back in office in 2025, Trump has outdone Biden (and himself). He launched his second term by granting mass pardons to the goons who beat police with flagpoles and stormed the Capitol on his behalf on Jan. 6, 2021. Since then, he’s pardoned a rogues’ gallery of donors, partisan allies and people with business ties to him or his family, including crypto billionaire Changpeng Zhao, the chief executive of Binance, a trading platform thatÂ
allowed
 terrorists and criminal organizations to finance their operations under the radar.
Zhao pleaded guilty to money laundering, but he also workedÂ
assiduously
 to boost the Trump family’s crypto business. It certainlyÂ
appears
 that he got a pardon in exchange for services rendered.
The second reason for getting rid of the president’s pardon power involves that earlier stuff about checks and balances. The Founding Fathers believed the only remedy for the corrupt abuse or misuse of pardons was impeachment. James Madison, the principal author of the Constitution, was explicit on this point.
At the Virginia ratifying convention, George Mason objected that the pardon power was too great, and that presidents could use pardons to suborn criminal activity on their behalf. MadisonÂ
responded
 that, “If the president be connected in any suspicious manner with any (such) persons, and there be grounds to believe he will shelter himself, the house of representatives can impeach him.”
The problem: Congress’ impeachment power has proven to be a dead letter in the modern era of hyper-partisanship. Just as presidents cannot be trusted to use the pardon power responsibly, Congress cannot be trusted with the responsibility to hold presidents accountable. Without checks, there is no balance.
There still should be room for pardons and clemency in our system. But leaving it solely in the power of presidents has led to evermore abuse. Indeed, I think it’s almost a certainty that Trump will use the Biden precedent to preemptively pardon much of his administration, his sons and himself before he leaves office. Given the ongoing weaponization of the justice system — and his abuse of it — he’d almost be a fool not to.
The Constitution was written with men like George Washington in mind. When Washington opted to step down after two terms, it established a two-term tradition that endured until Franklin Roosevelt violated it. Afterward, we amended the Constitution to codify what had been a tradition.
For most of our history, presidents took the solemnity of pardons — and the threat of impeachments — seriously. They no longer do. It’s time to change the Constitution accordingly.
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is
@JonahDispatch
.
