Slavery’s brutal reality shocked Northerners before the Civil War − and is being whitewashed today by the White House
The Trump administration’s recent review of Smithsonian exhibits, particularly those addressing slavery and related historical topics, has sparked a significant debate about how American history is presented to the public. This initiative, framed under the executive order “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” aims to shift the narrative towards celebrating American achievements while downplaying the darker aspects of the nation’s past. Notably, the administration has flagged powerful historical artifacts, such as the haunting photograph “The Scourged Back,” which depicts the scars of a formerly enslaved man. This image, while disturbing, serves as a stark reminder of the brutal realities of slavery that many would prefer to overlook. Critics argue that this move represents a modern-day attempt at historical whitewashing, echoing the long-standing battles of abolitionists who fought to expose the truth about slavery in a society that often turned a blind eye.
The historical context of this current debate draws parallels to the abolitionist movement of the 19th century, where activists employed graphic evidence and personal testimonies to confront the romanticized narratives of slavery propagated by Southern planters. Abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison and Angelina Grimké recognized the critical need to present the horrifying realities of slavery to an often indifferent public. They published pamphlets and newspapers that highlighted the injustices faced by enslaved people, challenging the prevailing narratives that painted slavery as a benign institution. For instance, Grimké’s pamphlet “American Slavery As It Is” meticulously documented the cruelty of slavery, shocking readers into acknowledging the systemic abuses that defined the institution. This historical effort to compel society to “look at” the atrocities of slavery is reflected in today’s discourse surrounding the representation of such history in museums and public spaces.
The implications of this historical review extend beyond the realm of museums; they touch on the broader societal responsibility to confront and remember the painful aspects of the past. The abolitionists understood that acknowledging the horrors of slavery was essential for moral accountability and preventing the repetition of such injustices. As the nation grapples with its legacy of racial oppression, the challenge remains to ensure that the narratives we choose to highlight do not obscure the painful truths that are integral to understanding American history. The debate over the Smithsonian exhibits thus serves as a crucial reminder of the ongoing struggle to confront historical injustices and the importance of maintaining a comprehensive and honest portrayal of the past.
The Trump administration is reviewing Smithsonian exhibits on slavery and other topics to reflect certain values.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Long before the first shots were fired in the Civil War, beginning early in the 19th century, Americans
had been fighting a protracted war of words
over slavery.
On one side, Southern planters and slavery apologists
portrayed the practice of human bondage
as
sanctioned by God and beneficial
even to enslaved people.
On the other side, opponents of slavery
painted a picture
of violence, injustice and the hypocrisy of professed Christians defending the sin of slavery.
But to the abolitionists, it became crucial to transcend mere rhetoric. They wanted to show Americans uncomfortable truths about the practice of slavery – a strategy that is happening again as activists and citizens fight modern-day attempts at historical whitewashing.
As a
media scholar who has studied
the history of abolitionist journalism, I hear echoes of that two-century-old narrative battle in President Donald Trump’s
effort to purge public memorials
and markers honoring the suffering and heroism of the enslaved as well as those who championed their freedom.
Celebration vs. reality
‘The Scourged Back,’ by McPherson & Oliver, is an 1863 image that depicts the scarred back of a formerly enslaved man.
Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington
Among the materials
reportedly flagged for removal
from history museums, national parks and other government facilities is a disturbing but powerful photograph known as “
The Scourged Back
.”
The 1863 image depicts a formerly enslaved man, his back horrifically scarred by whipping. It’s certainly hard to look at, yet to look away or try to forget it means to ignore what it has to say about the
complicated and often brutal history of the nation
.
In Trump’s view, these memorials are “revisionist” and “driven by ideology rather than truth.” In an executive order named
Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History
, Trump said public materials should “focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people.”
Essentially, the president appears to want a history that
celebrates American achievement
rather than being forced to look at “The Scourged Back” and other historical realities that document aspects of the American story that don’t warrant celebration.
Combating ignorance of slavery’s horrors
Thinking back to the decades leading up to the Civil War, facts were the weapon abolitionists wielded in their fight against the distortions of pro-slavery forces. It was an uphill battle in the face of indifference by many in the North. After a visit to Massachusetts in 1830, abolitionist writer William Lloyd Garrison
blamed such attitudes
on “exceeding ignorance of the horrors of slavery.”
It is not surprising that in the early 19th century many Americans would have had limited knowledge of slavery. Travel was arduous, time-consuming and expensive, and most Northerners had little firsthand exposure to slave societies. Abolitionists argued that those who did visit the South were often shielded from the harsher realities of slavery. This extended to the media ecosystem, which lacked any real national news organizations.
Moreover, Southern plantation owners carried out a robust propaganda effort to extol the beneficence of their economic system. In
letters
,
pamphlets
and books, they argued that slavery was beneficial to all and that the enslaved were happy and well-treated. They also attacked their opponents as evil and dishonest.
As abolitionist Lydia Maria Child
wrote in 1838
: “The apologists of Southern slavery are accustomed to brand every picture of slavery and its fruits as exaggeration or calumny.”
Don’t look away
Thus, the challenge for abolitionists was to show slavery as it really was – and to compel people to look. An emphasis on hard evidence took firm hold in the wave of abolitionism in the 1830s.
Activists didn’t yet have photography, so they relied on accounts from eyewitnesses and formerly enslaved people, official reports and even some plantation owners’ own words in
Southern newspaper advertisements seeking the return of runaways
.
“Until the pictures of the slave’s sufferings were drawn up and held up to public gaze, no Northerner had any idea of the cruelty of the system,” abolitionist Angelina Grimké wrote in her famous “
Appeal to the Christian Women of the South
” in 1836.
“It never entered their minds that such abominations could exist in Christian, Republican America; they never suspected that many of the gentlemen and ladies who came from the South to spend the summer months in travelling among them, were petty tyrants at home,” Grimké wrote.
In pamphlets and newspapers, Grimké and others laid down a documentary record of the abuses of slavery, naming names and emphasizing legal evidence of their claims.
In my research
, I have argued that while abolitionists didn’t invent the journalistic exposé, they did develop the first fully articulated methodology for confronting abuses of power through carefully documented facts – laying the groundwork for later generations of investigative reporters and fact-checkers.
Most critically, what they did is point a finger at injustice and demand that America not look away. In its first issue, in 1835, the newspaper Human Rights emphasized “the importance of first settling what slavery really is.” Inside, it included a series of advertisements documenting slave sales and rewards for runaways reprinted from Southern newspapers.
The headline: “
LOOK AT THIS!!
”
Tried and acquitted
Angelina Grimké was an abolitionist writer.
Library of Congress
One of the most remarkable efforts in this abolitionist campaign was a 233-page pamphlet called “
American Slavery As It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses
.” Published in 1839 by Theodore Dwight Weld along with his wife, Angelina Grimké, and her sister, it was an exhaustively documented exposé of floggings, torture, killings, overwork and undernourishment.
One example involved a wealthy tobacconist who whipped a 15-year-old girl to death: “While he was whipping her, his wife heated a smoothing iron, put it on her body in various places, and burned her severely. The verdict of the coroner’s inquest was, ‘Died of excessive whipping.’ He was tried in Richmond and acquitted.”
It is difficult reading, to be sure, and certainly the kind of material that might foster “a national sense of shame,” as Trump’s executive order claims. But getting rid of the evils of slavery meant first acknowledging them. And the second part – critical to avoiding the mistakes of the past – is remembering them.
‘Consciences shocked’
So how effective was this abolitionist campaign to lay bare the terrible facts about slavery?
At least some readers of “
American Slavery As It Is
” had their consciences shocked.
One New Hampshire newspaper reacted this way
: “We thought we knew something of the horrid character of slavery before, but upon looking over the pages of this book, we find that we had no adequate idea of the number and enormity of the cruelties which are constantly being perpetrated under this system of all abominations.”
And
one famous reader was Harriet Beecher Stowe
, who drew on the book as inspiration for “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” published more than a decade later.
The 1830s reflected the height of the abolitionist movement in books, pamphlets and newspapers. While the activism continued in the 1840s and 1850s, ultimately it took secession and civil war to finally end slavery. But, of course, it didn’t take long for the country to fall into a prolonged period of formal and informal segregation in both the North and the South, many vestiges of which remain.
That reality of a history that doesn’t proceed along a straight path to justice underscores the importance of preserving, remembering and teaching difficult parts of the past such as “The Scourged Back.”
On the title page of “
American Slavery As It Is
,” Weld and the Grimkés printed a quote from the biblical book of Ezekiel: “Behold the wicked abominations that they do.” It was a command to the nation to look without flinching at what it was, and it is as pertinent today as it was then.
This article was corrected to include the correct image of Angelina Grimké.
Gerry Lanosga does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
