Amazon fends off greenwashing lawsuit after SCOTUS refuses to hear case
In a significant legal development, the U.S. Supreme Court has opted not to hear a case involving online retail giant Amazon and its protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This case originated from a lawsuit filed by Planet Green Cartridges, a company specializing in re-manufactured printer cartridges, which accused Amazon of facilitating the sale of falsely labeled products that misrepresented themselves as eco-friendly and sustainable. The lawsuit claimed that Amazon’s platform allowed third-party sellers to promote misleading products, leading to unfair competition and consumer deception. Planet Green Cartridges sought a staggering $500 million in damages, arguing that Amazon’s algorithm effectively endorsed these misleading listings, which generated approximately $3 billion in sales for the falsely advertised items.
At the heart of the legal dispute is Section 230, a crucial piece of legislation that protects online platforms from being held liable for user-generated content. Amazon contended that, as an online marketplace, it should be shielded from liability under this law, which has long been viewed as a cornerstone of a free and open internet. The 9th Circuit Court previously dismissed the case, affirming that Amazon could not be held accountable for the claims made by third-party sellers. Planet Green Cartridges then petitioned the Supreme Court to clarify whether Section 230 protections apply to online marketplaces that profit from promoting and distributing products, raising questions about the scope and applicability of these protections in the context of modern e-commerce.
The implications of this case extend beyond Amazon and Planet Green Cartridges, touching on broader issues of online accountability and the role of algorithms in shaping consumer choices. Section 230 has become a focal point in discussions about online censorship and the responsibilities of tech companies, especially as AI-driven algorithms increasingly influence what products and content users encounter. Recent Supreme Court rulings on similar matters involving social media platforms like YouTube and Twitter have highlighted the ongoing debate about the extent to which these companies should be held responsible for the content they promote. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the outcome of such cases could redefine the legal framework governing online marketplaces and their obligations to consumers.
The highest court in the land has declined to hear a case brought up from the lower circuit courts early this year involving online retail giant
Amazon
and its protections under Section 230.
Amazon was
sued by Planet Green Cartridges
, a U.S. re-manufacturer of printer cartridges, for allowing third- party companies to advertise and sell falsely labelled products claiming to be re-manufactured or recycled. Re-manufacturing is considered a more sustainable manufacturing process, reducing raw material and energy consumption by restoring products to manufacturer standards.
SEE ALSO:
Black Friday 2025: Get live updates on the latest sales, doorbusters, and deal drops
Planet Green Cartridges sought $500 million in third-party liability damages from Amazon based on the recommendation of greenwashed products. The lawsuit argued that Amazon’s algorithm promoted listings that falsely advertised new, imported cartridges, raking in $3 billion in sales and creating unfair competition among sellers as customers were deceived by false advertising into purchasing less sustainable products.
Amazon’s counterargument hinged on online merchandiser protections outlined in Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects internet service hosts from government regulation and shields them from legal liability for the content their users post. It is considered by many to be a tentpole of a free and open internet.
Following several conflicting lower court decisions, the case was
dismissed by the 9th Circuit court
in March, stating that Amazon couldn’t be held liable for the claims written by third-party sellers. Planet Green Cartridges then petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case and clarify whether Section 230 protections extend to online marketplaces that also profit from the recommendation, promotion, or distribution of products on their website — as Amazon does — in addition to hosting the listings.
Section 230 and online censorship have become hot button topics in the U.S., especially as social media platforms have mostly
backed off from content moderation
. Increasingly powerful, AI-enhanced algorithms have complicated the matter. In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard two Section 230
cases brought against YouTube and Twitter
(now X), which argued the social media companies should be held accountable for aiding and abetting terrorism through their algorithmic feeds. The court dismissed the complaint against Google, YouTube’s parent company, and ruled in favor of Twitter’s Section 230 protections.
