Trump Told a Woman, ‘Quiet, Piggy,’ When She Asked Him About Epstein
In a recent edition of *The Atlantic Daily*, the newsletter highlighted troubling remarks made by former President Donald Trump towards female journalists, exemplified by his interaction with Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey aboard Air Force One. When Lucey pressed Trump on the Epstein files, he reacted with condescension, telling her to “quiet, piggy,” a comment that reflects a broader pattern of disrespect towards women in the media. This incident is not isolated; it echoes Trump’s long history of derogatory remarks directed at female journalists, such as Megyn Kelly and Yamiche Alcindor, often employing sexist language that diminishes their professional credibility. Trump’s behavior signifies a troubling precedent for the treatment of women in political discourse, where insults are wielded as tools to silence and belittle.
The newsletter also contextualizes Trump’s remarks within a larger framework of misogyny that has characterized his political career. For instance, during his first presidential campaign, Trump infamously referred to Kelly’s menstrual cycle in a derogatory manner, showcasing a consistent trend of using crude language against women. This conduct is compounded by his dismissive comments about the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, where he suggested that Khashoggi’s fate was deserved. Such statements not only undermine the dignity of women but also reflect a broader degradation of the political landscape, where leaders resort to internet troll-like behavior rather than upholding the decorum expected from public officials.
As the political climate shifts, particularly with increasing female voter engagement in recent elections, there is a growing expectation for leaders to exhibit basic decency and respect. The *Atlantic* article argues that Trump’s comments are not merely personal attacks but a broader assault on women’s dignity and the integrity of the presidency itself. In a time when the political discourse is often marred by crassness, the article calls for a reevaluation of how leaders communicate and the importance of treating all individuals with respect, especially those exercising their First Amendment rights. The implications of Trump’s rhetoric extend beyond individual interactions, influencing societal norms and expectations regarding gender and power in politics.
This is an edition of The
Atlantic
Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture.
Sign up for it here.
“Keep your voice down.”
“That’s enough of you.”
“Be nice; don’t be threatening.”
“There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”
“Quiet, piggy.”
This is a sampling of what the president of the United States has said to and about female journalists during his time in office—and most recently to Catherine Lucey, a White House correspondent for Bloomberg. On Friday on Air Force One, Lucey
asked Donald Trump
about the Epstein files. He answered her first question, but when she followed up, the president bent his head down and pointed his finger, the way you might chastise a screaming child or shoo a stray cat. “Quiet. Quiet, piggy,” he said.
Lucey had clearly touched a nerve. Two days later, Trump announced that he would endorse
the House’s vote
on the release of the Epstein files, likely because he knew that the House had the numbers to do so and would go forth with or without his support. But this category of remark is part of a long-running pattern for the president: Trump’s time in American politics has been marked by repeated attempts to insult and demean female journalists.
At the start of his first presidential campaign,
Megyn Kelly
, at the time a Fox News journalist, asked Trump at a primary debate about reports that he had referred to women as “fat pigs,” “dogs,” and “slobs.” Trump didn’t deny the accusation, and instead made a joke about how he said those sorts of things only about Rosie O’Donnell. Later, talking about the debate on CNN, Trump said of Kelly: “
There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever
.” And the president has
repeatedly insulted
Yamiche Alcindor, now a White House correspondent for NBC. At a press briefing about COVID-19 in 2020, Trump replied to her question about his prior statements on governors’ ventilator requests by
saying
, “That’s why you used to work for the
Times
and now you work for somebody else … Be nice; don’t be threatening.”
The president’s
vitriol
against those exercising their First Amendment rights is not limited to women. Today, during a White House visit with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the president said of the murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi that “a lot of people didn’t like that gentleman” and that “things happen,” suggesting the journalist may have deserved his killing. (In 2018, Saudi officials lured Khashoggi to Turkey and murdered him, dismembering his body with a bone saw.) At a 2024 campaign rally, he fantasized about
shooting journalists
. His comments to female reporters, however, have another through line:
Why can’t you just be silent like a woman should?
Trump has an even longer history of denigrating women more broadly. This is reportedly not the first time that he has used the word
piggy
to describe a woman. Alicia Machado, the winner of the 1996 Miss Universe pageant, has alleged that
Trump
once called her
“Miss Piggy”
and made other demeaning comments about her weight. And the president’s longtime feud with O’Donnell has included much public sexism, including Trump calling her a
“big, fat pig”
in 2006. (Most recently, the president has floated the prospect of revoking O’Donnell’s
American citizenship
, a move that legal experts say would be blatantly unconstitutional.) And this is just how Trump
talks
to women, leaving aside the many credible accusations of sexual abuse and
misconduct
against him, which he has continued to deny.
When asked for comment about Trump’s remarks on Air Force One, a White House official told
The Guardian
, “This reporter behaved in an inappropriate and unprofessional way towards her colleagues on the plane … If you’re going to give it, you have to be able to take.” The White House did not provide any evidence of inappropriate behavior. “Giving it” is doing one’s job, apparently, and “taking it” is being called a pig by the president for asking him a question.
If the president needs a political motive to treat women respectfully in public, he has one. This month’s elections saw
high turnout
among women supporting Democratic candidates, and evidence suggests that
young, highly educated women
are becoming more and more disgusted by the MAGA movement. But Americans should also hope that their leaders are guided by basic decency at the very least. “The United States is now a nation run by public servants who behave no better than internet trolls, deflecting criticism with crassness and obscenity,” my colleague
Tom Nichols
wrote earlier this month. Trump’s sexist comments are an attack on women’s dignity—and by making them, he strips the presidency of its dignity too.
Related:
Misogyny comes roaring back.
Tom Nichols: A confederacy of toddlers
Here are three new stories from
The Atlantic
:
Trump’s eye-popping postelection windfall
What if “America First” appears to work?
The Trump administration’s favorite tool for criminalizing dissent
Today’s News
The House passed a bill directing the Justice Department to
release all of its Jeffrey Epstein–investigation files
, achieving near-unanimous support despite months of Republican efforts to avoid a vote.
Last night Trump said
that House Republicans should vote for the release, insisting, “We have nothing to hide.”
Federal judges
blocked Texas’s new congressional map
, calling it a race-based gerrymander. The ruling forces the state to use its map drawn in 2021, a major setback for Trump’s redistricting push.
The Trump administration announced a
plan to dismantle the Education Department
, shifting its programs to other federal agencies.
Evening Read
Illustration by Isabella Cotier
The Social Cost of Being a Morning Person
By Liz Krieger
As my wake-up time has inched earlier, I’ve written more, exercised more consistently, and been able to approach challenges with clarity, well before afternoon fatigue sets in.
But every transformation comes with a price. And mine has been paid in evening hours—those crucial moments when families traditionally reconnect after a day apart, when teenagers may be more likely to open up, when friends gather and marriages deepen in the comfortable darkness after responsibilities have been met. I have become a person who gives the best of herself to the morning and offers only the dregs to the night.
Read the full article.
More From
The Atlantic
Advent calendars are totally out of control.
America has a baby-formula problem—again.
Tesla wants to build a robot army.
America is taking the train.
Culture Break
Illustration by Matteo Giuseppe Pani / The Atlantic
Explore.
Can you cheat at conversations? A new AI tool promises to improve social interactions
but instead makes them worse
, Julie Beck writes.
Watch.
In September, Shirley Li
recommended the most exciting films
heading to theaters through the end of the year—some of which are out now.
Play our daily crossword.
Explore all of our newsletters here.
Rafaela Jinich
contributed to this newsletter.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting
The Atlantic
.
