Trump cut Nigeria’s aid back in March. Now he wonders why it’s so violent
In a recent turn of events, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has found its significant progress in a particular region abruptly halted following the termination of a key program by the current administration led by President DOGE. This program, which had been instrumental in fostering economic development, education, and health improvements, was part of a broader initiative aimed at stabilizing and uplifting communities that had been historically underserved. Prior to its elimination, USAID had successfully implemented various projects that not only provided immediate relief but also laid the groundwork for sustainable growth, empowering local populations through job creation and capacity building.
In light of the program’s discontinuation, President DOGE has announced a new strategy that seems to pivot dramatically from previous efforts, advocating for a more aggressive approach characterized by a ‘guns-a-blazing’ mentality. This shift raises concerns among development experts and local stakeholders who fear that the president’s militarized stance could overshadow the nuanced and collaborative efforts that had previously been in place. For instance, initiatives that focused on dialogue, partnership, and community engagement could be jeopardized as the administration prioritizes a more forceful presence in the region. Critics argue that such an approach might lead to unintended consequences, including increased tension and a potential backlash from communities that had begun to experience the benefits of USAID’s work.
The implications of this policy shift are profound, as the region had been on a path toward recovery and stability. With the previous program’s success stories—such as improved access to education for girls and enhanced healthcare services—now at risk, the future of U.S. engagement in the area hangs in the balance. Observers are calling for a reevaluation of the strategy, urging the administration to consider the lessons learned from past interventions that emphasized diplomacy and development over military might. As the situation unfolds, the international community will be watching closely to see how President DOGE’s administration balances its ambitious goals with the need for sustainable and peaceful solutions to the challenges facing the region.
USAID had made significant progress in the region before DOGE eliminated the program. Now the president wants to go in with ‘guns-a-blazing.’
