When the world’s largest battery power plant caught fire, toxic metals rained down – wetlands captured the fallout
In January 2025, a catastrophic fire erupted at the world’s largest battery energy storage facility, located in Moss Landing, California, releasing thick smoke and hazardous materials that affected surrounding wetlands, farms, and communities. The blaze, which lasted from January 16 to 18, forced highway closures and evacuations as firefighters struggled to contain the flames. Local residents reported health issues such as headaches and respiratory problems, while some pets and livestock experienced illness. Although officials declared the air quality met federal safety standards shortly after the incident, they overlooked the critical issue of heavy metal fallout from the burning batteries. This oversight has raised concerns about the long-term environmental impact on the region.
A team of researchers, led by marine geologist Ivano Aiello, examined the aftermath of the fire and its effects on local ecosystems. Their study revealed that the ashes and debris from the fire contained toxic metals like nickel, manganese, and cobalt, which are commonly found in lithium-ion batteries. Using portable X-ray fluorescence, the researchers discovered a significant increase in these heavy metals in the marshes adjacent to the facility, estimating that approximately 25 metric tons of heavy metals were deposited across half a square mile of wetland. This finding is particularly alarming given that the burned facility housed around 1,900 metric tons of cathode material, and estimates suggest that between 55% to 80% of the batteries were lost in the fire. The research not only established a clear link between the fire and the contamination but also underscored the potential for these metals to bioaccumulate in the food chain, posing risks to local wildlife, including sea otters and harbor seals.
The Moss Landing incident serves as a critical reminder of the need for improved safety measures and regulations surrounding battery storage facilities, particularly as the demand for renewable energy solutions continues to grow. In response to the fire, California has enacted new legislation to enhance containment and monitoring protocols at large battery installations, ensuring that emergency responders are better prepared for future incidents. Additionally, the shift towards safer battery technologies, such as those using iron phosphate cathodes, may help mitigate fire risks. Ongoing research into the ecological impacts of the heavy metal contamination will be essential to understanding the long-term consequences for the region’s wildlife and ecosystems, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive environmental monitoring in areas adjacent to battery storage facilities.
A battery energy storage facility that was built inside an old power plant burned from Jan. 16-18, 2025.
Mike Takaki
When fire broke out at
the world’s largest
battery energy storage facility in January 2025, its thick smoke blanketed surrounding wetlands, farms and nearby communities on the central California coast.
Highways closed, residents evacuated and firefighters could do little but watch as debris and ash rained down. People living in the area reported headaches and
respiratory problems
, and some pets and livestock fell ill.
Two days later, officials announced
that the air quality met federal safety standards
. But the initial all-clear decision missed something important – heavy metal fallout on the ground.
A chunk of charred battery debris found near bird tracks in the mud, with a putty knife to show the size. The surrounding marshes are popular stopovers for migrating seabirds. Scientists found a thin layer of much smaller debris across the wetlands.
Ivano Aiello, et al, 2025
When
battery energy storage facilities burn
, the makeup of the chemical fallout can be a mystery for surrounding communities. Yet, these batteries often contain
metals that are toxic
to humans and wildlife.
The smoke plume from the fire in
Vistra’s battery energy storage facility
at Moss Landing released not just hazardous gases such as hydrogen fluoride but also soot and charred fragments of burned batteries that landed for miles around.
I am a
marine geologist
who has been
tracking soil changes
in marshes adjacent to the Vistra facility for over a decade as part of a wetland-restoration project. In a new study published in the journal Scientific Reports, my colleagues and I were able to show through detailed before-and-after samples from the marshes
what was in the battery fire’s debris
and what happened to the heavy metals.
The batteries’ metal fragments, often too tiny to see with the naked eye, didn’t disappear. They continue to be remobilized in the environment today.
The Vistra battery energy storage facility – the large gray building in the lower left, near Monterey Bay – is surrounded by farmland and marshes. The smoke plume from the fire rained ash on the area and reached four counties.
Google Earth, with data from Google, Airbus, MBARI, CSUMB
,
CC BY
What’s inside the batteries
Moss Landing, at the edge of Monterey Bay, has long been shaped by industry – a mix of power generation and intensive agriculture on the edge of a delicate coastal ecosystem.
The Vistra battery storage facility rose on the site of an
old Duke Energy and PG&E gas power plant
, which was once filled with turbines and oil tanks. When Vistra announced it was converting the site into the world’s largest lithium-ion battery facility, the plan was hailed as a
clean energy milestone
. Phase 1 alone housed batteries with 300 megawatts of capacity, enough to power about 225,000 homes for four hours.
The energy in rechargeable batteries comes from the flow of electrons released by lithium atoms in the anode moving toward the cathode.
In the type of batteries at the Moss Landing facility, the cathode was rich in three metals: nickel, manganese and cobalt. These batteries are prized for their high energy density and relatively low cost, but they are also prone to
thermal runaway
.
Lab experiments have shown that
burning batteries can eject metal particles
like confetti.
Metals found in wetlands matched batteries
When my team and I returned to the marsh three days after the fire, ash and burned debris covered the ground. Weeks afterward,
charred fragments still clung to the vegetation
.
Our measurements with portable X-ray fluorescence
showed sharp increases in nickel, manganese and cobalt
compared with data from before the fire. As soon as we saw the numbers, we alerted officials in four counties about the risk.
We estimate that about
25 metric tons
(55,000 pounds) of heavy metals were deposited across roughly half a square mile (1.2 square kilometers) of wetland around
Elkorn Slough
, and that was only part of the area that saw fallout.
To put this in perspective, the part of the Vistra battery facility that burned was hosting 300 megawatts of batteries, which equates to roughly 1,900 metric tons of cathode material. Estimates of the amount of batteries that burned range
from 55%
to
80%
. Based on those estimates, roughly 1,000 to 1,400 metric tons of cathode material could have been carried into the smoke plume. What we found in the marsh represents about 2% of what may have been released.
These contour maps show how metals from the Moss Landing battery fire settled across nearby wetlands. Each color represents how much of a metal – nickel, manganese or cobalt – was found in surface soils. Darker colors mean higher concentrations. The highest levels were measured about two weeks after the fire, then declined as rain and tides dispersed the deposits.
Charlie Endris
We took samples at
hundreds of locations
and examined millimeter-thin soil slices with a scanning electron microscope. Those slices revealed metallic particles smaller than one-tenth the width of a human hair – small enough to travel long distances and lodge deep in the lungs.
The
ratio of nickel to cobalt
in these particles matched that of nickel, manganese and cobalt battery cathodes, clearly linking the contamination to the fire.
Over the following months, we found that surface concentrations of the metals dropped sharply after major rain and tidal events, but
the metals did not disappear
. They were remobilized. Some migrated to the main channel of the estuary and may have been flushed out into the ocean. Some of the metals that settled in the estuary could enter the food chain in this wildlife hot spot, often populated with sea otters, harbor seals, pelicans and herons.
A high-magnification image of a leaf of bristly oxtongue, seen under a scanning electron microscope, shows a tiny metal particle typically used in cathode material in lithium-ion batteries, a stark reminder that much of the fallout from the fire landed on vegetation and croplands. The image’s scale is in microns: 1 micron is 0.001 millimeters.
Ivano Aiello
Making battery storage safer as it expands
The fire at Moss Landing and its fallout hold lessons for other communities, first responders and the design of future lithium-ion battery systems,
which are proliferating
as utilities seek to balance renewable power and demand peaks.
When fires break out, emergency responders need to know what they’re dealing with. A California law passed after the fire helps address this by requiring
strengthening containment and monitoring
at large battery installations and meetings with local fire officials before new facilities open.
How lithium-ion batteries work, and why they can be prone to thermal runaway.
Newer lithium-ion batteries that use iron phosphate cathodes are also
considered safer from fire risk
. These are becoming more common for utility-scale energy storage than batteries with nickel, manganese and cobalt, though they store less energy.
How soil is tested is also important. At Moss Landing, some of the government’s sampling
turned up low concentrations
of the metals, likely because the samples came from broad, mixed layers that diluted the concentration of metals rather than the thin surface deposits where contaminants settled.
Continuing risks to marine life
Metals from the Moss Landing battery fire still linger in the region’s sediments and food webs.
These metals bioaccumulate, building up through the food chain: The metals in marsh soils can be taken up by worms and small invertebrates, which are eaten by fish, crabs or shorebirds, and eventually by top predators such as sea otters or harbor seals.
Our research group is now
tracking the bioaccumulation
in Elkhorn Slough’s shellfish, crabs and fish. Because uptake varies among species and seasons, the effect of the metals on ecosystems will take months or years to emerge.
Ivano Aiello receives funding from private donors.
