Cal Thomas: A ‘permanent pause’ on immigration
In the wake of a tragic shooting involving two National Guard members in Washington just before Thanksgiving, former President Donald Trump has called for a “permanent pause” on migration, particularly from Afghanistan and other unstable regions. This announcement comes amidst growing concerns about the vetting process for immigrants entering the United States. Trump’s proposal emphasizes a need for stricter background checks to ensure that those who arrive in America are “loving America,” and he advocates for revoking legal status for individuals who do not meet these standards. The urgency of this call is underscored by the fact that the suspect in the shooting, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, had entered the U.S. shortly after assurances were made by then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki regarding the thorough vetting of Afghan refugees under President Biden’s “Operation Allies Welcome” program.
The context surrounding this debate is significant, as over 190,000 Afghans have been resettled in the U.S. through various programs since the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. Critics argue that the sheer number of resettled individuals raises questions about the adequacy of the vetting process, especially given that the suspect reportedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attack, a phrase often associated with Islamic extremism. This incident has reignited discussions about immigration policy and national security, with Trump asserting that if individuals harbor malicious intentions, they should not be allowed entry into the U.S. or should be deported if already present. He further argues that financial ties to countries that fund terrorism should be severed to protect American interests.
The historical precedent for pausing immigration is noteworthy, with references to the Immigration Act of 1924, which established quotas favoring certain nationalities and aimed to allow for the assimilation of immigrants into American society. This historical lens highlights the ongoing tension between immigration and national identity, with Trump’s comments reflecting a broader concern among some Americans about the implications of uncontrolled immigration on social cohesion and safety. As the debate continues, the challenges of balancing humanitarian responsibilities with national security remain a pressing issue, prompting questions about the effectiveness of current immigration policies and the need for reform.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F0sbkGQfbc
Following the shooting of two National Guard
members
in Washington the day before Thanksgiving, President Trump announced he wants to “
permanently pause migration
” at least until he is satisfied that those from Afghanistan and other unstable countries have had their backgrounds thoroughly investigated. The president also wants to revoke the legal status of many of them and expel those who don’t measure up to his standard, which is “loving America.”
Vetting is usually a detailed process for those seeking entry to the U.S., especially when they are from countries associated with terrorism. On Sept. 1, 2021, then-White House press secretary
Jen Psaki
was asked about the large number of Afghans who had entered the country under President Biden’s
“Operation Allies Welcome
” (OAW) program. Psaki said: “I can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into the United States of America who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process.”
After last week’s shooting. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted on X that the suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, entered the U.S. one week after Psaki’s comment.
More than
190,000
Afghans have been resettled in the U.S. under OAW and another program called Enduring Welcome,
according to a report published this year by the US State Department.
Claiming all were properly vetted strains credulity.
If America’s enemies wanted to undermine and eventually destroy the country, sending people here who may have evil intentions is a stealth way to do it. Just as we should not be the policemen of the world, neither should we be expected to be the receivers of the world. We can’t afford it on several levels.
Pausing immigration has precedent.
The Immigration Act of 1924
established a national origins quota for 40 years until it was repealed in 1965 by another law, the Immigration and Nationality Act. The earlier Act favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and excluded many Asians. It also limited new arrivals from Southern and Eastern Europe. Aside from any racial components, most Americans seemed to favor restricting immigration to allow those already here to assimilate. That included becoming proficient in English as well as embracing the history and Constitution of the United States. This process conformed to our national motto “Out of many, one.” The failed border policies of the Biden administration contributed to the hyphenating of many according to their ethnic heritage. It has reversed the motto to effectively mean “out of one, many.”
The usual suspects are saying the predictable things about the “causes” of last week’s senseless attack. They include the deployment of the National Guard, more gun control laws, additional mental health resources and other nonsense. Notice that no one is mentioning religion, specifically Islamic extremism.
Authorities claim they don’t know the suspect’s “motive.” Here’s a clue. Witnesses
reportedly
heard him shout “Allahu Akbar,” or God is great, before opening fire. It is a statement many terrorists have used before carrying out their murderous acts. Is that enough motive, or do the authorities fear being called “Islamophobes” for stating the obvious?
President Trump is correct when he says we need to know who is coming to America and their intentions. If those intentions are bad – as in wishing to kill Americans – they should not be admitted. That’s what the vetting process is supposed to discover. If they are already here and feel this way, they should be deported. Money from countries that have supported terrorism – like Qatar which has funded Hamas and is sending millions of dollars to American universities – should be cut off.
If we don’t protect ourselves from this blight, who will?
Readers may email Cal Thomas at
tcaeditors@tribpub.com
. Look for Cal Thomas’ latest book “A Watchman in the Night: What I’ve Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America” (HumanixBooks).
