Peng: US coal can bring end to Russia’s war in Ukraine
In a strategic move to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin and accelerate negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, President Trump is focusing on Russian coal exports as a key target for sanctions. While previous sanctions on oil and gas have had limited success in curbing Russia’s military aggression, a concentrated effort to disrupt the coal market could yield significant results. Currently, Russian coal exports generate an estimated $31 billion annually, bolstering the Kremlin’s war budget, with major buyers including China, India, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey. Notably, these nations are either allies or significant trading partners of the United States, which presents a unique opportunity for the Trump administration to leverage trade negotiations to diminish Russia’s coal market.
The rationale behind focusing on coal is compelling: the Russian coal industry is already feeling the strain from lost European buyers and is at a critical juncture. With sanctions, rising operational costs, and declining energy prices, the economic foundation of Russia’s coal sector is beginning to show signs of weakness. The industry employs over 140,000 people and is vital to local economies in several regions, making it a potential Achilles’ heel for Putin. By negotiating lower tariffs on U.S. coal exports in exchange for reduced Russian coal imports, the U.S. could not only support its own coal industry—already a significant exporter to the aforementioned countries—but also exert pressure on Russia’s economy.
This strategy aligns with broader political sentiments favoring the use of tariffs as a tool against military aggression, and it resonates with Trump’s pro-working-class agenda. If this approach could shorten the war even marginally, it represents a pragmatic avenue for achieving peace while simultaneously benefiting American miners. As the situation in Ukraine continues to evolve, targeting Russian coal exports could emerge as a pivotal element in the U.S. strategy to bring about a resolution to the conflict, highlighting the intersection of international trade, energy policy, and geopolitical stability.
President Trump continues to zero in on Russian energy to bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table. The administration has targeted Russian oil and gas giants with new sanctions and has imposed tariffs on U.S. trading partners that buy Russian oil.
If Trump wants the war in Ukraine to end, he needs to target Russian coal.
So far, sanctions against Russian energy sales have not done enough to stop Putin from continuing the brutal war. However, a targeted campaign to eliminate the market for Russia’s massive coal exports could make a difference.
Russia’s coal industry is under intense pressure after losing European buyers, but it has been able to export coal to other parts of the world, mainly Asia.
Russian coal exports are contributing $31 billion annually to its war budget, primarily from sales to five countries that are either allies or trading partners of the United States — China, India, South Korea, Taiwan and Turkey. Remarkably, Russian coal exports are now worth more than its pipeline oil and natural gas exports.
While persuading China to reduce its import of Russian coal is a tall order, the four other largest buyers are either close allies or major trading partners looking to secure favorable trade deals with the United States.
The administration holds the cards. Lower U.S. tariffs could be negotiated in exchange for swapping Russian coal imports for greater U.S. coal imports. The U.S. coal industry, already a major exporter to all four countries, has the capacity to displace Russian exports.
The logic for zeroing in on coal sales is simple: Not only is it a significant source of foreign currency for the Kremlin but Russia’s coal industry is on an economic precipice. Cracks are starting to show on Russia’s wartime economy, as sanctions, rising costs and weak energy prices are having profound economic repercussions.
Russia’s coal industry employs more than 140,000 people and remains critical in some regions, as a source of jobs and funding for local budgets.
A U.S. campaign to tighten the screws on the Russian coal industry would almost certainly produce serious political problems for Putin.
The war has gone on for far too long. If using U.S. trade leverage to cripple Russian coal exports could shorten the war by even a week, it’s a tool the United States should use. For Trump, it could deliver the peace he seeks and provide a boon to an industry he supports.
The idea of using tariffs to address problems like military aggression is an old one with broad political support. It is our unique political moment, combined with the populist appeal of dividends for American miners, that could turn the concept into reality. This strategy is pro-peace, pro-competitiveness and pro-working class, which aligns perfectly with Trump’s agenda.
Syd S. Peng is the Charles E. Lawall Chair of Mining Engineering emeritus in the Department of Mining Engineering at West Virginia University/InsideSources
Eric
Eric is a seasoned journalist covering General news.
