Letters to the editor
As Congress approaches the end-of-January deadline for passing the FY2026 budget, the urgency for a structured and lawful budget process is clear. William Deignan from Medford emphasizes the necessity of protecting Congress’s constitutional authority over financial appropriations, particularly in light of the chaotic budgetary practices witnessed during the Trump Administration. He highlights the illegal impoundments and partisan rescissions that undermined Congress’s power of the purse, warning that such actions threaten the very foundation of American democracy. Deignan argues that for democracy to thrive, each branch of government must respect its constitutional role, and any deviation from this balance can erode public trust and destabilize governance.
Deignan calls for lawmakers to incorporate robust safeguards into the upcoming budget to prevent future administrations from disregarding congressional directives. He stresses that the budget must not only be passed but also be enforceable, ensuring that the executive branch adheres to the law as intended by Congress. This plea for a constitutionally sound budget underscores the vital importance of legislative integrity and accountability in maintaining the principles of democracy.
In a separate commentary, Jeffrey Padell from East Walpole raises questions about the concept of reparations, particularly in light of his own family history. He argues against the notion of reparations by pointing out that his ancestor fought and died in the Civil War to free enslaved individuals. Padell contends that if reparations are to be considered, it would be just to also acknowledge the sacrifices made by Union soldiers. He further questions the fairness of compensating individuals who were never enslaved from those who never owned slaves, suggesting that the conversation around reparations is more complex than it may appear.
Meanwhile, Donald Moskowitz from Londonderry, NH, critiques a proposed peace plan aimed at resolving the ongoing war in Ukraine. He perceives it as a capitulation to Russia that would allow the country to retain occupied territories and reduce Ukraine’s military capabilities. Moskowitz draws parallels between this situation and historical agreements like the Munich Agreement, which failed to curb aggressive expansionism. He argues that the plan not only threatens Ukraine’s sovereignty but also emboldens Russia for future military endeavors, ultimately undermining stability in Europe. Each of these perspectives reflects deep concerns about governance, historical accountability, and international relations, highlighting the complexities of contemporary political discourse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KahPH6oc12I
Passing budget
As Congress races toward its end-of-January deadline to pass the FY2026 budget, one truth must be front and center: we cannot afford a repeat of last year’s chaos.
The illegal impoundments and partisan rescissions by the Trump Administration in 2025 were not mere technical disputes; they were an assault on Congress’s constitutional power of the purse. When any administration ignores the law and withholds funds Congress has already directed, it undermines the very structure that keeps our Republic standing.
Our democracy survives only when each branch respects its constitutional role. When that balance is violated, public trust crumbles, confusion reigns, and the foundations of our government weaken.
As lawmakers shape the next budget, they must build in firm safeguards that prevent future administrations from defying the will of Congress. The budget must not only pass; it must be enforceable.
I urge our elected officials to protect the Constitution by passing a budget that ensures the Administration carries out the law as Congress intended. Our democracy depends on it.
William Deignan
Medford
Reparations
I keep hearing about reparations. My biggest question is why should I have to pay reparations since one of my ancestors died in Andersonville Prison while fighting to free the slaves. I think that if reparations are approved then we need reparations for every one of the Union dead, people who gave their lives to free the slaves. And finally why should people who were never slaves get money from people who never owned slaves?
Jeffrey Padell
East Walpole
Russia
The proposed peace plan to end Russia’s devastating war in Ukraine is a capitulation to Russia, and it rewards an invading hostile country. Furthermore, the resultant plan gives Russia impetus to conduct future warfare to expand further west in Europe.
The plan calls for Russia to stop the war, but it would retain the land it occupied during the invasion, which is one fifth of Ukraine. Ukraine would have to reduce the size of its military. It would have to agree not to join NATO and not allow NATO troops on its territory.
Ukraine would receive a guarantee from the U.S. for security protection, but the U.S. guaranteed protecting Ukraine in 1994 if Ukraine agreed to disarm its nuclear weapons and send them to Russia. Ukraine complied with the agreement, and Russia then proceeded to invade Ukraine in 2014 and 2022.
The peace plan includes lifting the sanctions on Russia thereby allowing Russia to resume world trade.
This peace plan reminds me of the Munich Agreement signed by Neville Chamberlain of Great Britain and Adolph Hitler of Nazi Germany on Sept. 30, 1938, which included ceding part of Czechoslovakia to Hitler for his promise not to further expand in Europe. Subsequently from 1939 to 1944 Hitler invaded and occupied a large part of Europe.
Donald Moskowitz
Londonderry, NH
Eric
Eric is a seasoned journalist covering General news.
