Why the Gulf Monarchs Shower Trump With Gifts
In 1785, Benjamin Franklin received a lavish parting gift from King Louis XVI of France: an extravagant gold case containing a portrait of the king surrounded by 408 diamonds. This opulent token, often referred to as a snuffbox, raised concerns about foreign influence on American governance, leading to Congress granting Franklin permission to keep it under the Articles of Confederation. The Founding Fathers, wary of European monarchies using gifts to undermine American sovereignty, enshrined a prohibition in the Constitution against federal officeholders accepting gifts from foreign states without explicit Congressional consent. This historical context underscores the gravity of current events, particularly in light of former President Donald Trump’s dealings with Gulf monarchies during his second term.
Since 2022, Trump has engaged in extensive financial entanglements with Gulf states, receiving promises of hundreds of millions of dollars through investments and real estate deals. His relationships with figures like Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman have led to significant geopolitical favors, raising alarms about the potential subversion of American sovereignty. Unlike past presidents, Trump has embraced the model of governance typical in Gulf states, where public and private interests are intertwined. As he navigates these lucrative deals, questions arise about the motivations behind his foreign policy decisions, particularly as they appear to align closely with the interests of his financial backers. The Founders’ fears about leaders being beholden to foreign powers resonate today, as Trump’s actions seemingly prioritize personal financial gain over national interests.
The implications of Trump’s dealings are profound, especially as they unfold against a backdrop of American foreign policy that has historically leaned pro-Saudi, even under different administrations. While President Biden initially sought to distance the U.S. from Saudi Arabia, geopolitical realities have necessitated a recalibration of that stance. Trump’s second term has seen him rapidly accelerate favorable policies toward Saudi Arabia, such as designating the kingdom a “major non-NATO ally” and lifting sanctions on Syria at Riyadh’s behest. These actions, coupled with the significant financial ties between Trump and the Saudi monarchy, evoke the very concerns the Founders sought to prevent. As the U.S. navigates its relationship with foreign powers, the ongoing entanglements raise critical questions about the integrity of American democracy and the potential for foreign influence to shape domestic policy in ways that undermine the principles upon which the nation was founded.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9l4A05Bk8c
When Benjamin Franklin left Paris in 1785, after nearly nine years as the American emissary to France, King Louis XVI presented him with a parting gift. The token exuded the rococo extravagance of the ancien régime: a portrait of the monarch, surrounded by 408 diamonds, held in a gold case. It was frequently described as a snuffbox, a term that hardly captures its opulent nature; the item was likely far more valuable than anything Franklin owned.
Under the Articles of Confederation—the document governing the still-fragile republic—Franklin could keep the gift only with the explicit permission of Congress, which it reluctantly granted. But the gift unsettled the country. The Constitution, written two years later, barred federal officeholders from accepting
any
gift, payment, or title from a foreign state without Congress’s explicit consent. The Founders feared that European monarchies would seek to control the new country by showering it with gifts, which would undermine its capacity for self-government.
Until Donald Trump, no U.S. president had ever yielded to royal temptations from abroad. But in his second term, Trump has discarded that old inhibition in its totality. Since 2022, the Trump family has
been promised
hundreds of millions of dollars—in the form of investments, real-estate licensing deals, even an airplane—from Gulf monarchies and the business entities they control.
[
Read: America has never seen corruption like this
]
During his second term, and especially during Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s recent visit to Washington, Trump has rewarded his benefactors with sweeping geopolitical favors. Their huge investments in his family’s businesses are hard to describe as anything other than the spectacular subversion of American sovereignty, wherein the nation’s foreign policy reads as a thank-you note to the president’s biggest financial boosters.
Really, Trump is adopting the governing style of his backers. In the Gulf states, hardly any distinction exists between public and private interests; the royal family governs the state and dominates the economy. They oversee sovereign-wealth funds, control the largest companies, and treat nominally private enterprises as instruments of royal policy. When a Gulf developer or investment vehicle pays Trump—or licenses his brand—it is not a private commercial transaction. It is a political act: a foreign monarch using his wealth to cultivate influence, dependence, and favor.
In a monarchy, a ruler governs in part through beneficence—binding subjects through appointments, indulgences, and other blandishments. That this model might be applied to American officeholders was the gravest threat to the republic: Leaders enriched by a foreign monarch cannot be trusted to act independently. When a leader is financially entangled with foreign regimes, it becomes impossible to discern their motives: Are they acting out of conviction, or obligation? That uncertainty was precisely what the Framers sought to banish.
The timing of Trump’s deals with the Saudis tells a disturbing story. Before he became president, he never managed to break into the kingdom’s real-estate market. But during his first term, he proved his worth. He stood by MBS after the Saudi leader ordered the murder of the
Washington Post
columnist Jamal Khashoggi. Trump
backed
the kingdom and its Emirati allies during their blockade of Qatar in 2017, despite the fact that the United States maintains one of its largest military bases there.
The Trump family was rewarded for its demonstrations of loyalty. In 2021, Jared Kushner—Trump’s son-in-law, who was a top adviser during his first term—sought a $2 billion investment from the Saudi sovereign-wealth fund for the private-equity firm he was creating. The Saudi fund’s professional advisers
warned
that the fledgling Kushner firm’s operations were “unsatisfactory in all aspects.” But the crown prince controls the fund’s board, and the board
overruled
the professionals.
Then, after Trump announced that he was running to reclaim the presidency, the Saudis began to shower him with real-estate deals. In 2022, Dar Global—the international arm of a Saudi developer that is routinely described as having
“close ties”
to the royal family—contracted with the Trump Organization to
manage
a hotel and golf course in Oman. Two years later, the company unveiled a
Trump Tower
in Jeddah, followed by plans for a
Trump Plaza
in the city. The pattern was unmistakable: The Saudis were licensing the Trump name for a series of lavish mega-projects in places such as
Riyadh
, Dubai, Doha, and the Maldives.
The Trump family has become enmeshed in Saudi investment deals to an extent possible only with the crown prince’s approval. But have these entanglements actually corrupted American foreign policy? As the Founders understood, that question drifts into the murky realm of motives—always difficult to parse and almost impossible to prove.
American foreign policy was already becoming pro-Saudi long before Trump arrived for his second term. Although Joe Biden came into office vowing to make Saudi Arabia a “pariah” for killing Khashoggi, he
softened his stance
over time and pursued a
grand bargain
: Saudi normalization with Israel in exchange for Israeli movement toward a two-state solution. That shift didn’t stem from personal enrichment or private dealings involving the Biden family; it emerged from geopolitics. Biden did not want Saudi Arabia drifting into China’s orbit. And Iran’s growing menace ensured that any American administration—whatever its ideological priors—would be pushed toward cooperation with Riyadh, which stands among Tehran’s most committed regional adversaries.
[
Listen: The most corrupt presidency in American history
]
But Biden sought to extract substantial concessions as he deepened the alliance: not just Saudi diplomatic recognition of Israel but also
assurances
that the kingdom would keep the dollar at the center of its financial system. His administration
pressed
Riyadh to curb its brutal intervention in Yemen.
In his first months back in office, Trump has delivered the defense protections that Biden merely dangled before the Saudis. Last week, he even
designated
the kingdom a “major non-NATO ally.” He signed an executive order pledging to defend Qatar against any attack, not long after that country
gifted
him a $400 million airplane. (Technically donated to the Pentagon, the plane will be transferred to Trump’s presidential-library foundation no later than January 2029.) At Riyadh’s urging—“Oh, what I do for the crown prince,”
Trump said
—the president
lifted
sanctions on the new Sunni-led government in Syria. And to burnish the image of his family business’s financial benefactor, he once again
excused
the murder of Khashoggi. Yet he has extracted almost nothing in return—aside from vague
promises
of Saudi investment in American firms, commitments the kingdom has every incentive to make regardless of American favors. This is exactly the kind of one-sided arrangement the Constitution was written to prevent: a republic bending toward the preferences of a foreign monarch whose wealth has seeped into the president’s private dealings.
What the Founders feared as an existential threat to the republic is now unfolding in plain sight. The anxiety they enshrined in the Constitution is being flouted with barely any disguise. The Founders understood that the nation’s immune system needed to reject even the smallest, most seemingly innocent foreign attempts to influence American politics. The president is ceding American sovereignty to a foreign monarchy, and there’s hardly any price to be paid.