Trump ‘took notes from the Grinch’: States sue over SNAP program changes
A coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general has taken legal action against the Trump administration, filing a lawsuit aimed at blocking new guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) that they argue unlawfully categorizes thousands of immigrants, including refugees and asylum seekers, as “permanently” ineligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The lawsuit, filed in Eugene, Oregon, contends that the USDA’s new eligibility criteria, which were introduced in a memo last month, misinterpret the intent of the recent GOP-led Big Beautiful Bill tax and spending legislation. The attorneys general assert that this guidance not only misclassifies certain lawful immigrants but also threatens to destabilize SNAP, the nation’s largest anti-hunger program, which currently assists around 40 million Americans each month.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta emphasized that the USDA guidance misapplies existing regulations regarding SNAP eligibility. He highlighted that refugees, asylees, and other humanitarian entrants should become eligible for benefits once they obtain their green cards and meet standard program requirements. The attorneys general estimate that the new guidance could affect thousands of individuals across various states, with over 30,000 residents in New York alone potentially impacted. They argue that the guidance creates a patchwork system of benefits that could cause significant financial harm and impose penalties on states that fail to comply with the new rules. The lawsuit seeks emergency relief from a federal judge to halt the implementation of the USDA’s guidance, which was published with little notice, giving states only one day to adjust to the new requirements.
The implications of this lawsuit extend beyond legal technicalities; they touch on the essential issue of food security for vulnerable populations. The attorneys general warn that the USDA’s actions could lead to a significant loss of food assistance for individuals who are legally entitled to support, undermining the very purpose of SNAP. By challenging the USDA’s guidance, the coalition aims to protect the rights of lawful immigrants and ensure that families who have navigated the complexities of immigration law are not unjustly denied access to vital nutrition assistance. As this case unfolds, it highlights the ongoing tensions between state and federal policies regarding immigration and social welfare, and the potential consequences for millions of Americans relying on these crucial support systems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYjx_7PRJPU
A coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general sued the
Trump
administration
Wednesday to block new U.S. Department of Agriculture guidance that they argue illegally lists thousands of immigrants — including refugees and asylum seekers — as being “permanently” ineligible for anti-hunger benefits.
The
lawsuit
, filed by the attorneys general Wednesday in Eugene, Oregon, seeks to block the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s new, more narrow eligibility criteria for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, which the agency published in a memo late last month.
They argued that the new USDA guidance, intended to comply with a provision under the GOP-led Big Beautiful Bill tax and spending legislation, goes beyond what lawmakers intended by incorrectly classifying certain individuals — including refugees and asylum seekers who have been granted lawful permanent resident status in the U.S. — as “permanently ineligible” for SNAP.
Rather, they said, the guidance “threatens to destabilize SNAP nationwide,” and risks jeopardizing food access for families who “have done everything right.”
TRUMP, STATES BACK IN COURT OVER SNAP AS BENEFITS REMAIN IN LEGAL LIMBO
The attorneys general said Wednesday that the
new USDA guidance
in question makes clear that “refugees, asylees, humanitarian parolees, individuals whose deportation has been withheld, and other humanitarian entrants become eligible for SNAP once they obtain their green cards and meet standard program requirements.”
California Attorney General Rob Bonta told reporters on a call Wednesday that the USDA guidance “blatantly misapplies the agency’s own regulations” for SNAP, the nation’s largest anti-hunger program that provides food aid to some 40 million Americans each month.
While it is unclear how many individuals in each state would be affected, the attorneys general estimated the number would be well into the thousands, including more than 30,000 residents in New York alone.
The new guidance “misclassifies entire groups of lawfully present immigrants as ‘not eligible’ when the law says they are eligible once they become lawful permanent residents,”
Bonta said
Wednesday, describing the guidance as reading “like someone took notes from the Grinch.”
STATES SUE TRUMP ADMIN OVER BILLIONS IN LOOMING CUTS TO SNAP, FOOD STAMPS
The lawsuit asks a federal judge in Oregon to grant emergency relief and issue an order blocking the USDA guidance. It also warned that the patchwork system of benefits created as a result of the guidance “threatens to destabilize SNAP nationwide,” and risks financial harm, including penalties issued to states who do not comply with the guidance.
The new USDA memo “attempts to rewrite those rules, ignoring Congress and threatening to cut off food assistance for people who are fully eligible under the law,” the attorneys general said Wednesday.
States also took aim at the USDA’s decision to publish the narrower guidance on Oct. 31, four months after the spending bill was signed into law.
States had just one day to comply with the narrower guidance, they noted on the call.
The guidance “imposes these errors on states with virtually zero time to implement them,” Bonta said.
