Rep. Swalwell sues Trump official over mortgage fraud allegations: ‘A gross abuse of power’
In a significant legal move, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) has filed a lawsuit against Bill Pulte, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), accusing him of unlawfully accessing and utilizing private mortgage records of several Democrats to instigate federal criminal investigations. The lawsuit, submitted in federal court in Washington, D.C., claims that Pulte abused his authority by scouring government databases for the personal records of political opponents, including Swalwell himself, to fabricate allegations of mortgage fraud that were subsequently referred to the Department of Justice (DOJ). Swalwell asserts that this action not only violates the Privacy Act and the First Amendment but also represents a gross misuse of power aimed at silencing dissenting voices within the political arena.
The lawsuit details a specific incident where the DOJ initiated a probe into Swalwell over alleged mortgage fraud, based on claims that he misrepresented his D.C. home as his primary residence to secure better loan terms. Swalwell vehemently denies these allegations, describing them as a “gross mischaracterization of reality.” As he prepares to launch his campaign for California governor in 2026, Swalwell argues that the release of his personal information has not only tarnished his reputation but has also exposed him and his family to heightened security risks. The suit highlights a broader pattern of what Swalwell perceives as political retaliation against critics of former President Donald Trump, noting similar referrals made by the FHFA against other prominent figures, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and Senator Adam Schiff.
Swalwell’s lawsuit seeks damages, a declaration that the FHFA has violated federal law, and an injunction to retract the referral made to the DOJ. He emphasizes that Pulte’s actions represent a dangerous precedent where government power is weaponized against political opponents, undermining core democratic principles. As the case unfolds, it raises critical questions about the intersection of politics and government authority, and whether such actions can be viewed as a systematic effort to intimidate and silence critics within the political landscape. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications not only for Swalwell’s political future but also for the broader discourse on privacy rights and political accountability in the United States.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbCHpSbxsLM
Rep.
Eric Swalwell
, D-Calif., accused a top housing official of secretly pulling Democrats’ private mortgage records and weaponizing them to trigger federal criminal probes, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday.
In the suit, filed in federal court in Washington, D.C.
,
Swalwell claimed that Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte abused his position to obtain the mortgage records of numerous Democrats, which he used in criminal referrals to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
The civil suit argued that the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) did not have the authority
to obtain, use or leak private data belonging to several prominent Democrats, who are widely viewed as staunch critics of President
Donald Trump
.
“Today I have filed a civil lawsuit against FHA Director Bill Pulte for violating the Privacy Act and First Amendment,” Swalwell said in a statement. “Director Pulte has combed through private records of political opponents. To silence them.”
REPUBLICANS FEUD OVER ‘ARCTIC FROST’ ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURE, BUT CRITICS OFFER NO CLEAR ALTERNATIVE
According to the lawsuit, Pulte “abused his position” by scouring government-sponsored databases for the private records of a number of Democrats, including Swalwell, which he then used “to concoct fanciful allegations of mortgage fraud” that he referred to the DOJ for prosecution, the lawsuit stated.
The
DOJ opened a probe
into Swalwell on Nov. 13 over alleged mortgage fraud.
The lawsuit stated that Pulte claimed in his referral to the DOJ that Swalwell falsely claimed his D.C. home as his primary residence on a mortgage agreement to help secure more favorable loan terms.
But the
California Democrat’s suit
described the allegations in the referral as a “gross mischaracterization of reality” that represents “a gross abuse of power that violated the law.”
“The allegations in Pulte’s referral are patently false,” the suit argued.
The DOJ probe came as Swalwell set his sights on a higher office, announcing last week that he is
launching a campaign for California governor in 2026
. The lawsuit claims that the release of his personal information has harmed his reputation ahead of his gubernatorial campaign and forced him to “expend personal resources” as he fights the DOJ probe.
LAWYERS FOR COOK, DOJ TRADE BLOWS AT HIGH-STAKES CLASH OVER FED FIRING
Swalwell added in his complaint that the “widespread publication of information about the home where his wife and young children reside has exposed him to heightened security risks and caused him significant anguish and distress.”
Swalwell claims in his suit that his political views have “earned him the ire of President Trump.” The lawsuit points to additional referrals FHFA made to the DOJ involving political figures who are seen as critics of Trump, including New York Attorney General Letitia James
,
Sen.
Adam Schiff,
D-Calif., and Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, arguing that there is a pattern of political retaliation.
A federal judge threw out the indictment against Letitia James on Monday.
Swalwell argued that Pulte’s “unlawful actions” were intentional and represented “a purposeful attack on core democratic norms and reflect a base desire to achieve exactly what the First Amendment and the Privacy Act exist to prevent: the use of government machinery to chill and silence the government’s critics.”
Swalwell is seeking damages, a declaration that FHFA violated federal law and an injunction forcing the agency to retract its referral.
Pulte and the Federal Housing Finance Agency did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
