Battenfeld: Sketchy $100K scheme to raise revenue could be latest Boston boondoggle
Boston’s City Council has recently approved a $100,000 pilot program aimed at generating revenue through the sale of official merchandise, such as hats, hoodies, and water bottles featuring the city seal and branding. This initiative, championed by Councilor Sharon Durkan and backed by Mayor Michelle Wu, is intended to capitalize on the upcoming 250th anniversary of the United States in 2026. However, skepticism surrounds the program, with many questioning the demand for such merchandise among both residents and tourists. Durkan’s optimistic assertion that “when you fall in love with a city, you want to wear it on your chest” seems to clash with the reality that few are clamoring for Boston-themed apparel.
Critics of the initiative highlight the significant challenges and costs associated with trademarking the city’s logos and symbols, which would be necessary to protect against counterfeit merchandise. The city’s ambitious revenue goals, projected to reach tens of millions, appear unrealistic given the mixed success of similar ventures in other cities, with New York City being a notable exception. Additionally, the program raises concerns about potential political motivations, as it could serve as a platform for Wu to promote her image and connect with politically aligned businesses. The idea of using slogans or quotes associated with Wu for merchandise has also been floated, prompting a satirical take on alternative slogans that could resonate more with the public, such as “Have a Blast at Mass and Cass!” and “I Shoplifted this T-Shirt in Downtown Crossing.”
In essence, while the city hopes to tap into a lucrative market with this merchandise initiative, the feasibility and public interest remain in question. The program’s launch aligns with a significant historical milestone, but the execution and reception of Boston-themed merchandise may ultimately determine whether it becomes a beloved local staple or another costly misadventure for the city. As the debate unfolds, the potential for humorous and irreverent slogans could provide a more engaging and relatable alternative to the official merchandise, reflecting the city’s unique character and the sentiments of its residents.
It has all the makings of the latest city of Boston boondoggle – a sketchy scheme to raise revenue by selling official merchandise like hats, hoodies and water bottles emblazoned with the city seal and brand to gullible tourists and residents.
Who in their right mind is clamoring for official Boston merch besides the illustrious City Council and maybe Mayor Michelle Wu, who could benefit politically from the program?
No one really, but that hasn’t stopped the city from proceeding with a $100,000 taxpayer-funded pilot venture approved by the free-spending council.
“When you fall in love with a city, you want to wear it on your chest, you want to put it on a hoodie, a cap, and carry it on your water bottle,” Councilor Sharon Durkan told the Boston Globe in a positive puff piece.
The program is timed to start with next year’s 250th anniversary of the country, which could be a good starting point for selling t-shirts with a “Boston 250” logo.
Ellen Foord, Boston’s chief creative officer, said the city has gotten Boston University students to workshop ideas and marketing plans for the program.
First of all, Boston has a “chief creative officer?” Secondly, let’s hope the students don’t come up with party ideas or drinking logos for the city.
The city will then decide which iconic names or symbols the city wants to trademark, such as the blue letter “B” and the city seal or maybe a drawing of ghastly Boston City Hall.
The city has lofty goals of making tens of millions in added revenue from the branding program, which is highly unrealistic given that a few other cities have tried this without much success, except iconic New York City.
The problem is that in order to make real money, the city would need to get trademarks and licensing rights to the city seal and other official logos and spend millions of dollars in legal fees to block counterfeit merch.
Although it’s a city council idea first proposed by Councilor and Wu supporter Sharon Durkan, don’t be surprised if Wu tries to hijack it to put her smiling face and name on the venture, and attack President Trump. It’s also a chance to give printing or merchandising deals to politically connected or unionized business supporters.
She could also try to trademark some of her favorite quotes about Boston.
“Boston: the safest major city in the country” would be one she undoubtedly would try to license.
Or: “Boston Will Never Back Down.”
Another of her chestnuts: “In Boston, We Don’t Listen to Kings.”
And maybe even for 2028, “Wu for President.”
But how about some alternative merch that will be even hotter sellers? Sayings and slogans not necessarily approved by the Wu administration.
Such as:
“Have a Blast at Mass and Cass!”
“Bike Lane Insane.”
“America’s Safest City…HaHa.”
“Most of our City Council hasn’t been Indicted”
“Boston: We’re not so Krafty.”
‘We Throw a Great Holiday Party and You’re Not Invited!”
“Boston: It’s Trump’s Fault.”
“I Heart Wutopia.”
“I’m from Boston, how about Wu?”
“Boston: Love it or Leave it, or just leave it.”
“One if by Land, Two if by ICE.”
“I Shoplifted this T-Shirt in Downtown Crossing.”
“Wake Up and Smell the Cannabis.”
“Boston: If Only We Could Tax the Rats.”
Now, those might be a real cash cow.
