Why people trust influencers more than brands – and what that means for the future of marketing
The rise of influencers in the digital age has transformed the landscape of marketing and consumer engagement, evolving from a niche concept to a multi-billion-dollar industry expected to surpass $32 billion by 2025. Historically, brands relied on traditional celebrities—musicians, athletes, and actors—to endorse their products. However, the advent of social media in the late 2000s democratized influence, allowing ordinary individuals to cultivate substantial followings and become key players in brand marketing strategies. By the 2010s, influencer marketing had matured into a global phenomenon, supported by the emergence of agencies and digital marketplaces that professionalized influencer-brand partnerships. Regulatory bodies, such as the Federal Trade Commission, have also stepped in, ensuring transparency in sponsored content.
One of the most significant aspects of influencer marketing is the establishment of “parasocial relationships,” where followers feel an emotional connection to influencers, akin to knowing a friend. This perceived intimacy fosters trust, making consumers more likely to value influencer recommendations over traditional advertisements. Influencers provide various forms of value to their followers, including social connections, entertainment, educational content, practical advice, and even financial benefits through discounts and deals. As a result, brands are increasingly shifting their focus to mid-tier and micro-influencers, who often generate higher engagement and stronger community ties than their mega-influencer counterparts. However, influencers face the challenge of maintaining authenticity while navigating the complexities of partnerships, regulations, and the pressures of public scrutiny.
As the influencer economy continues to evolve, brands must recognize the intricate dynamics at play. Influencers are not merely content creators; they are entrepreneurs and community leaders who balance the demands of their personal and professional lives. The success of influencer marketing hinges on trust, which can be easily undermined by missteps or perceived inauthenticity. As the industry grows, it will be essential for brands to engage thoughtfully with influencers, understanding the high-pressure environment they operate in and the importance of supporting their well-being. The future of the creator economy will require careful navigation of regulatory challenges, platform ethics, and the delicate balance between commercial partnerships and personal authenticity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sXYuIHPVik
Not long ago, the idea of getting paid to share your
morning routine
online would have sounded absurd. Yet today, influencers are big business: The global market is
expected to surpass US$32 billion
by the end of 2025.
Rooted in celebrity culture but driven by digital platforms, the influencer economy represents a powerful force in both commerce and culture. I’m
an expert
on digital consumer research, and I see the rise of influencers as an important evolution in the relationship between companies, consumers and creators.
Historically, brands leaned on traditional celebrities like musicians, athletes and actors to endorse their products. However,
by the late 2000s
, social media platforms opened the door for everyday people to build audiences. Initially, influencers were viewed as a low-cost marketing tactic. Soon, however, they became a central part of marketing strategies.
In the 2010s, influencer marketing matured into a global industry. Agencies and
digital marketplaces
emerged to professionalize influencer-brand matchmaking, and regulators like the
Federal Trade Commission
started paying more attention to sponsored content.
The rise of video and short-form content like TikTok and Reels in the mid-2010s and 2020s added authenticity and emotional immediacy. These dynamics deepened influencer-follower relations in ways that brands couldn’t easily replicate. Influencers are now recognized as not only
content creators
, but also as
entrepreneurs
and
cultural producers
.
Why people trust influencers
Social media influencers often foster what researchers call “
parasocial relationships
” – one-sided bonds where followers feel as if they personally know the influencer. While the concept has roots in traditional
celebrity culture
, influencers amplify it through consistent, seemingly
authentic content
.
This perceived intimacy helps explain why consumers often
trust influencers more than brands
. Though the parasocial relationship isn’t mutual, it feels real. That emotional closeness cultivates trust, a
scarce but powerful currency
in today’s economy.
The goal for many influencers may be financial independence, but the path begins with
social and cultural capital
, acquired through community connection, relatability and niche expertise. As an influencer’s following grows, so does their perceived legitimacy. Brands, in turn, recognize and tap into that legitimacy.
Although risks exist, like
algorithmic incentives
and commercial partnerships that undercut authenticity, many influencers successfully navigate this tension to preserve their community’s trust.
The many ways creators add value
Like any economy, the influencer economy revolves around
value exchange
. Followers spend their valuable resources – time
and attention
– in return for something meaningful. Researchers have identified several forms of value that influencers’ content can take:
Connection,
or what researchers call “social value”: Influencers often build tight-knit communities around shared interests. Through live chats, comments and relatable storytelling, they offer a sense of belonging.
Fun,
or “hedonic value”: Many influencers provide enjoyment using entertainment, humor and a touch of allure in their content. Think cat videos, TikTok dances and
random acts of kindness
that deliver joy and distraction from the day-to-day.
Knowledge,
or “epistemic value”: Creators offer informational or
educational content
to feed consumer curiosity. This can be through tutorials, product reviews or deep dives into niche topics.
Usefulness,
or “utilitarian value”: From life hacks to product roundups, like “
Amazon must-haves
,” influencers provide utilitarian or practical value to help simplify consumer decisions and solve everyday problems.
Money,
or “financial value”: People love finding a bargain.
Discounts
, affiliate links and deal alerts offer direct economic benefit to followers. Some influencers even
launch their own products
or digital courses, delivering long-term value through entrepreneurial spinoffs.
These forms of value often overlap, reinforcing trust, and
can pay off financially
for influencers. In fact, consumers are significantly more likely to
trust user-generated content
like influencer posts over brand-generated advertising.
Lessons for brands
First, there’s evidence that smaller is often stronger. Marketing researchers categorize influencers based on how many followers they have, and nano- and microinfluencers – defined as those with fewer than 10,000 and 100,000 followers, respectively –
often generate stronger engagement
than mega-influencers with more than 1 million. Influencers with smaller followings can interact with their communities more closely, making their endorsements feel more credible.
This has driven brands to focus on
mid-tier and microinfluencers
, where return on investment is often stronger. As a result, influencer agencies, brokers, platforms and trade associations have sprung up to facilitate these partnerships.
Second, brands should remember that influencers’ role in the market comes with new challenges. As the field continues to
become more professionalized
, it’s also become more complex. Like other entrepreneurs, influencers must keep up with shifting regulations – namely,
FTC sponsorship guidelines
– which can lead to hefty fines if violated. Many struggle to identify
how to best file their taxes
when they receive freebies they are expected to build content around. It can also be a challenge for influencers to keep up with
continued algorithm tweaks
from the multiple social media platforms where they publish.
Influencers manage more than content creation. Their role includes quickly responding to followers’ comments and managing communities, as well as
handling trolls
, all of which is stressful. Personal brand management adds another layer of pressure. As influencers gain more brand partnerships, they run the risk of being seen as “selling out.” Because parasocial trust depends on being viewed as authentic, aligning with the wrong brand or being too promotional can damage the very connection that built an influencer’s following. A single misstep can
trigger public backlash
.
While growing a following can bring brand recognition and financial independence, some influencers even fear that they will
lose their own identity
. Influencers can struggle with work-life balance, as this is not a nine-to-five job. It requires being “always on” and the constant
blurred lines
. Their lives become their livelihoods, with little separation between personal and professional identity.
In short, when engaging with influencers, strategic brands will recognize that they operate within an intense,
high-pressure environment
. Organizations such as the
American Influencer Council
offer support and advocacy, but industry-wide protections are lacking.
Influencers have earned a central place in consumer culture not just by selling products, but by offering emotional proximity, cultural relevance and value. They’re not just marketers – they’re creators, community leaders and entrepreneurs.
As the creator economy continues to grow, trust will remain its cornerstone. However, the next chapter will require thoughtful navigation of issues like regulation, platform ethics and creator well-being. Understanding influencers means recognizing both their creative work and the evolving market that now depends on them.
Kelley Cours Anderson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
