Mastio: Privatize air traffic control, escape political drama
As the recent government shutdown comes to an end, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warns that airline traffic disruptions will persist for weeks, compounding the frustrations of millions of travelers who have already faced delays and cancellations. This situation highlights a critical vulnerability in the current air traffic control system, tethered as it is to the political machinations of Washington. In contrast, countries like Canada have successfully privatized their air traffic control systems, demonstrating that a non-profit organization can manage air traffic more efficiently and reliably than a government bureaucracy. With another potential shutdown looming in the near future, advocates argue that it is time to remove air traffic control from the political crossfire and transition to a user-funded, non-profit model.
Privatizing air traffic control could lead to a more stable and efficient system, funded through fees collected from airlines and private aircraft rather than through unpredictable government appropriations. This shift would eliminate the chaos associated with government shutdowns and allow for greater investment in training and technology. Critics of privatization often express concerns about safety and corporate greed, but proponents point to successful models like Nav Canada, which operates as a non-profit and is governed by a diverse board that includes representatives from airlines, general aviation, unions, and the government. Nav Canada has maintained safety standards comparable to those of the FAA while investing in modern technology, showcasing that a non-profit structure can effectively prioritize safety and efficiency without relying on taxpayer dollars.
The current FAA system, burdened by outdated technology and a convoluted budget, has struggled with modernization efforts, with significant delays in the implementation of the NextGen program. In contrast, Nav Canada has successfully upgraded its systems on time and within budget. The proposal to transition to a non-profit air traffic control model appeals to a broad spectrum of political ideologies, offering Democrats the promise of robust safety regulations and union protections, while providing Republicans with fiscal responsibility and a streamlined government. With growing public dissatisfaction stemming from the recent shutdown, there is renewed momentum in Congress to explore this privatization route, potentially paving the way for a more efficient and reliable air traffic control system that better serves the needs of travelers.
As the government shutdown sputters to a close, the Federal Aviation Administration says that airline traffic will take weeks to get back to normal. That will add to the millions of travelers who have already had their flights delayed, disrupted and even derailed altogether. It doesn’t have to be this way.
Even the socialists in Canada have figured out that a private non-profit can reliably control air traffic better than a government bureaucracy. And with the prospect of another government shutdown just months away, our current system is a glaring vulnerability – a tether to the whims of Washington when the private sector could do it better without all the drama.
Privatizing air traffic control, as Canada and dozens of other nations have successfully done, offers a reasonable path forward. It’s time to remove this essential function from the political crossfire – which has allowed funding to lapse 14 times since 1980 – and entrust it to a non-profit, user-funded corporation.
Privatization would fund air traffic control through fees on airlines and private aircraft — fees already collected but currently funneled through volatile appropriations. No more shutdowns. No more chaos. Moreover, a non-profit corporation would have the freedom to expand training of the air traffic controllers in short supply under a government system that has restricted access to education in parochial political battles in Congress.
Critics on the left fear privatization means corporate greed will compromise safety. They point to for-profit models and conjure images of cost-cutting at the expense of lives. But the proposal isn’t a Wall Street takeover; it’s a non-profit corporation, modeled after Canada’s Nav Canada. Established in 1996, Nav Canada is governed by a board representing airlines, general aviation, unions, and the government. It’s self-funded via service charges, not taxpayer dollars, and has invested billions in modern technology.
Safety? Transport Canada’s oversight ensures standards are similar to FAA benchmarks, with accident rates on par with the US since privatization. The FAA would retain ultimate safety certification and oversight, much as it does with aircraft manufacturers like Boeing. And unions are banned from striking.
Non-profit air traffic control could eliminate the troubling technological incompetence that plagues the FAA’s $25 billion annual budget, much of which funds legacy systems from the 1970s. The NextGen modernization program, planned since 2003, remains mired in delays and cost overruns. It was originally set to be implemented this year, but internal FAA reports show much of it won’t be in place til the 2030s – if then. The FAA’s excuses for this delay are comical. Nav Canada, by contrast, upgraded its radar and satellite systems on time. Some argue we should just take their technology and move it here.
There’s something in this idea for everybody. Democrats secure ironclad safety regulations and union protections that are already working globally. Republicans gain fiscal discipline and a smaller government.
Before the shutdown, Trump’s transportation secretary said this was a no-go for them. “To have a fight about privatization is just going to divide people,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said at a press conference earlier this year. “And what that’ll actually do is make sure that we don’t actually build a brand new air traffic control system.”
Nothing could be more popular than getting Donald Trump and Chuck Schumer out of the cockpit. Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia have all already kicked their prime ministers to the curb; we should do the same with our politicians. There’s already several pieces of legislation in Congress to get this done, and public outrage at the shutdown could be just the catalyst we need.
David Mastio is a national columnist for The Kansas City Star and McClatchy/Tribune News Service
Travelers line up for to check their tickets at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago last week. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)
