Why Can’t I Just Watch Sports on Television?
In a world where streaming services dominate our viewing habits, sports fans are grappling with a bewildering array of options to catch their favorite teams in action. The recent NBA media rights deal, which saw the league sever ties with traditional cable networks in favor of platforms like Prime Video and Peacock, was intended to enhance accessibility. However, it has instead led to a chaotic landscape where following teams like the New York Knicks requires navigating multiple subscriptions and complex broadcasting agreements. For Knicks fans, the dilemma is particularly acute; while some games are available on MSG+, others are exclusive to different platforms, leaving fans scrambling to piece together a viewing strategy that often feels more like a daunting math problem than straightforward entertainment.
The frustration is palpable among fans who just want to enjoy the game. With the Knicks recently making a strong playoff run and boasting a promising roster, the stakes are high. Yet, the reality is that many fans find themselves lost in a maze of subscription options, often resorting to online forums for guidance. The situation has become so convoluted that even retired NFL star J.J. Watt voiced his exasperation after missing a game due to a broadcasting dispute, highlighting that even those with substantial means are fed up with the fragmented viewing experience. This sentiment echoes a broader trend in sports broadcasting, where fans are increasingly burdened by the costs and complexities of watching their teams.
Despite the myriad challenges, the love for teams like the Knicks remains unwavering. Fans are determined to support their squads, even if it means investing in multiple streaming services, and often resorting to creative solutions to access games. The rise of illegal streaming sites has become a topic of discussion, albeit fraught with risks and legal implications. Ultimately, the current state of sports streaming raises a critical question: should following a team really require a color-coded spreadsheet and a hefty budget? As the NBA and other leagues continue to navigate this evolving landscape, fans hope for a more streamlined and affordable way to cheer for their teams without the headache of subscription overload.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eJDebbKU_s
If you, like me, are a fan of the Knicks, you probably caught last night’s game against the Heat on Prime Video. But if you want to see them play Miami again on Monday, you’ll need the streaming service MSG+ (at least, if you’re living in New York and lack cable). That’ll get you a bunch of games this season, including their December matchup against the Spurs, but you’ll also need Peacock if you intend to watch them play the Pistons in January. Oh, and if you’re keen for some Christmas-day basketball, you’ll have to find a service that gets you ESPN or ABC. This is, to state what every sports fan knows in her heart to be true, unbelievably stupid.
Last summer, the NBA signed a lucrative new media-rights deal, cutting ties with a longtime cable-network partner and adding two streamers: Prime Video and Peacock. The move was ostensibly about expanding the league’s reach and giving fans new options for watching games. Instead, it’s
caused chaos
—and prompted the rise of entire Subreddits devoted to the question:
How do I follow my team?
Fans have been making flow charts and doing frantic back-of-the-napkin math in an effort to figure out just how many streaming services they’ll need.
You need two subscriptions; no, four; no, three. It’ll cost $600—no, wait, more like $1,000.
The only consensus seems to be that this new era is a nightmare. “Welcome to hell sports fans,” one Redditor commented in September.
In many ways, sports are more accessible than ever: They’re on at all hours, shown on countless channels and streaming services, and broken down into bite-size highlights on Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, and YouTube. You can play in fantasy leagues, place bets on a growing number of apps, and listen to a never-ending roster of pundits debate niche stats on their podcasts. But for devoted fans trying to watch their team actually play all season, the landscape has never been trickier to navigate.
In the past few years, as streamers have proliferated, other major leagues have signed deals similar to the NBA’s—and the sports-broadcast sphere has become a fickle, fragmented mess. This season, NFL games are scattered across something like
10 different
TV networks and streaming services, and
The Athletic
puts the “typical viewing budget” for fans to watch in-market and national games at
about $630
. Baseball is
similarly chaotic
.
In one survey
, half of Americans said that the glut of streaming services has made it harder to find what they’re looking for.
[
Alex Kirshner: Sports streaming makes losers of us all
]
This month, the NFL legend J. J. Watt
delivered a rant on X
when
Monday Night Football
, which he’d planned to watch on YouTube TV, was suddenly unavailable because of a broadcasting-rights dispute with Disney. The retired defensive end ended up
missing
his former team’s big win over Dallas. He’d made $130 million playing football, but still insisted, “I’m not buying another streaming subscription.”
I knew following the Knicks this season was going to be hard, but I was determined to do it anyway. In May, they reached the Eastern Conference Finals for the first time in a quarter century—a milestone made all the sweeter by the fact that they had to defeat the Boston Celtics, their longtime rivals and the NBA’s reigning champs, to get there. Fans flooded the avenues around Madison Square Garden, and New Yorkers wore orange and blue for days. The Knicks ended up losing to the Pacers in a devastating Game 6, but they have a strong roster and a new head coach, and hopes are high this season.
As a fan, I want to focus on the important things: what outrageous orange ’fit Spike Lee will be wearing courtside, and whether the ever-stoic OG Anunoby will
crack a smile
.
I want to see Jalen Brunson
catch fire in clutch time
; Josh Hart be everything everywhere all at once; and KAT throw down dunks (and cry “
Oh my God
” whenever he takes a hit). Instead, I’m busy trying to figure out where I can watch the game.
In what feels like a cruel joke, the NBA League Pass subscription I got for free with my quarter-season Knicks tickets gives me live access to games that aren’t nationally broadcast except—get this—those featuring the New York Knicks (and the Brooklyn Nets, but whatever). Those are blacked out because of local broadcasting agreements.
A subscription to MSG+ gets me the majority of Knicks games—and is worth the $29.99 a month just for Walt “Clyde” Frazier’s commentary (when he’s at the mic, the Knicks aren’t just playing good basketball; they’re
“swoopin’ and hoopin’”
or “dishin’ and swishin’”). But Peacock and Prime Video have exclusive rights to certain games, too.
At one point, baffled as to whether I needed
another
subscription to get games broadcast on ESPN or ABC, I, too, headed to Reddit. Some Redditors console others or offer advice on the cheapest legal route to fandom. More often, they post pictures of ships and suggest that you “sail the seven seas, matey!” (i.e., just pirate games). But even that requires a certain amount of savvy, as anti-piracy organizations and law enforcement play whack-a-mole with illegal streamers. After Streameast, the world’s largest illegal sports-streaming platform,
was shut down in September
, fans complained that they had to spend games toggling between grainy, glitchy bootlegs.
[
Kaitlyn Tiffany: We’re in a golden age of illegal sports streams
]
Some people suggest switching allegiance—an out-of-region team can, perversely, be easier to watch—or moving abroad. My brother, a die-hard Rockets fan (don’t ask), lives in Sydney, Australia, and can catch every NBA game for less than $200 on League Pass. And here I am, boxed out of a Knicks stream when I live within cheering distance of the Garden. It stings, but I can’t quit the Knicks. I was with them while they wandered the playoff desert, and I’m not leaving them now. Imagine living in the same city as an iconic franchise with a title-contending team led by an all-star point guard with unrivaled grit and rooting for … Houston. I just can’t.
As a result of all this, I could now star in a Rocket Money commercial, in solidarity with the 21 percent of American streaming users
who invest in six or more
services. Will the leagues take pity on us? It shouldn’t take a handful of streaming services, many hundreds of dollars, and a color-coded spreadsheet to be a fan.
