Lucas: Moulton searches Dems’ cave-in for election clout
In a recent political showdown, U.S. Representative Seth Moulton has launched a direct attack on U.S. Senator Ed Markey, criticizing him for not taking a stand against Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer regarding the recent government shutdown. Moulton, who is vying for Markey’s seat in the 2026 Democratic primary, argues that Schumer’s failure to maintain a united Democratic front during the shutdown is indicative of a broader need for new leadership within the party. Moulton’s comments came after a bipartisan agreement in the Senate led to the reopening of the government, which he claims undermined the party’s commitment to protecting healthcare for millions of Americans.
Moulton’s critique highlights a growing rift within the Democratic Party, particularly as he positions himself as a candidate representing a “new generation of leadership.” This rhetoric is reminiscent of his previous unsuccessful attempts to unseat Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House. Despite his lack of Senate voting power, Moulton has called for Markey to join him in rejecting Schumer’s leadership, framing the issue as one of effectiveness in protecting vital social services. However, Markey has defended his voting record, emphasizing his commitment to opposing Republican efforts to dismantle healthcare provisions, which he believes is crucial for the welfare of his constituents.
The political landscape in Massachusetts is complex, with established figures like Markey and Elizabeth Warren holding significant influence. Moulton’s challenge to Markey may hinge on his ability to differentiate himself while also appealing to the party’s progressive base. The recent government reopening, which some view as a win for Republicans, complicates Moulton’s narrative. As he attempts to rally support against Schumer and Markey, he faces the daunting task of convincing voters that he represents a fresh perspective rather than merely a younger iteration of the same political ideals. This internal party conflict reflects broader national tensions within the Democratic Party, as they navigate the challenges of maintaining unity while addressing the diverse needs of their constituents.
Let’s see if we can get this straight.
U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton is attacking U.S. Sen. Eddie Markey because Eddie Markey is not attacking Sen. Chuck Schumer for failing to keep the government shut down.
Democrats believe that no government is the best form of government — if Donald Trump is president.
Moulton, 47, who is challenging Markey, 79, for reelection in the 2026 Democrat primary, wants Schumer, 74, the Democrat Senate minority leader, dumped even though Moulton is not a member of the Senate — at least not yet.
But that will not stop Moulton who, calling for “a new generation of leadership,” — meaning him — twice tried (2016, 2018) but failed to oust fellow Democrat Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House.
Pelosi announced in 2022 that she would step down as Speaker. Last week, at age 85, and a millionaire many times over, she said she would not seek reelection.
Now Moulton is at it again, even though this time he does not even have a vote in the matter.
Following Sunday night’s Senate breakthrough in opening the government, which Schumer opposed — as did Markey and fellow Massachusetts progressive Democrat Elizabeth Warren — Moulton said, “Tonight is another example of why we need new leadership.”
Eight defecting Democrats joined the Republicans in the Senate to vote in favor of reopening the government after accepting GOP promises to take up proposed extensions of Obamacare tax credits, a sticking point, following the opening. Markey, of course, was not among them.
In fact, Markey later bragged about voting 15 times with Schumer in favor of shutting down the government to keep the Republicans from “ripping health care away from millions of people.”
“I want to be clear about this. I voted no,” Markey said.
But that was not enough for Moulton. He said, “If Chuck Schumer were an effective leader, he would have united his caucus to vote ‘No’ tonight and hold the line on health care.”
“Maybe now Ed Markey will finally join me in pledging not to vote for Schumer” as the Democrat minority leader.
Moulton’s problem in challenging Markey, who was elected to public office before Moulton was born, is that that are so politically alike. Moulton could be the son that Markey never had.
Outside of the age issue, Markey does not have much to run on in taking on Markey, unless Moulton can convince voters that he is a younger version of the senior Markey and a Marine combat veteran.
And talking about Schumer to a Massachusetts audience is not going to cut it.
It may be hard for Massachusetts Democrats, from Warren, Markey, Moulton, and Gov. Maura Healey on down to process it, but the reopening of the government is major victory for Trump.
That is because Trump was pushing the policy of a working government while Schumer and the Democrats wanted a woke one.
The Republican stand of opening the government was what the people wanted, while the Democrats in shutting it down sought the approval of the Mamdani radical wing of their party.
Trump won because he was on the right side of the issue.
All he had to do was wait for the Democrats to cave, and they did.
The Senate Democrats who defected and joined the Republicans to open the government realized that Schumer caused more hardship for people and the country in 40 days than Joe Biden did in four years.
Bernie Sanders, the sputtering old lefty from Vermont, who championed the shutdown, called the late-night vote reopening the government “a very bad night.”
A bad night for Bernie Sanders is a good day for America.
Veteran political reporter Peter Lucas can be reached at: peter.lucas@bostonherald.com
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters about Democratic victories on Election Day at the Capitol in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., in the Capitol subway earlier this fall in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)
.
