Week 11 Anger Index: BYU’s long-standing beef with the CFP committee

In the first College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings of the 2025 season, several teams and conferences find themselves in contentious positions, leading to frustration and disappointment among players, coaches, and fans alike. The rankings, which were released earlier this week, revealed a landscape that has sparked debate over the fairness and accuracy of the selection process. Notably, teams from the Pac-12 and Big 12 conferences expressed their discontent as they were largely overlooked in favor of teams from the SEC and Big Ten, which continue to dominate the national conversation.

For instance, the Pac-12, which has seen a resurgence in competitiveness this season, had several teams ranked in the top 10 of the AP Poll but failed to secure a spot in the initial CFP rankings. This oversight has left teams like Oregon and Washington feeling slighted, especially considering their strong performances against ranked opponents. On the other hand, the Big 12 faced similar frustrations as teams like Oklahoma State and Kansas State, both of whom have been performing well, found themselves outside the playoff picture. The emphasis on traditional powerhouses from the SEC, such as Alabama and Georgia, has raised questions about bias in the selection committee’s criteria, particularly when teams from less heralded conferences have demonstrated their capability to compete at a high level.

Moreover, the rankings have reignited discussions about the need for expansion in the playoff format. With the current system favoring teams from the SEC and Big Ten, many argue that a more inclusive approach could provide opportunities for deserving teams from other conferences to showcase their talents on a national stage. This sentiment is echoed by players and coaches who believe that the current rankings do not accurately reflect the depth and quality of competition across college football. As the season progresses, the pressure mounts for the selection committee to reassess their approach and consider a broader range of criteria that encompasses not just historical performance, but also current season achievements. The debate surrounding the CFP rankings highlights the ongoing challenges within college football as it strives to balance tradition with fairness and inclusivity.

Related articles:
– Link 1
– Link 2